196
The last time Iran damaged a US warship we destroyed their entire Navy in one day, with resources that happened to be nearby. I don't like their chances here.
Fucking exactly. You've hundreds of sailors/marines who've been edging for YEARS and now they finally might get to bust that war but, they're practically begging them to make a move lmao.
The Ayatollas don't realize that when 🇺🇸Americans🇺🇸 talk about war, they're really talking about masturbation.
And who said that truth? Alfred Einstein
Current US Naval vessels with a confirmed kill:
Constitution
...and maybe more, Iran.
Y'all wanna try us, dude? Go ahead. Give my TM and FT friends a real good reason to set Battle Stations Torpedo. We'll be glad to oblige.
Calm down boot, I was a squid. If you learned your own branch's history you'd know the only commissioned surface vessel that's ever scored a kill is the Constitution.
Hence the "and maybe more." Jesus, you guys can't read for shit.
Go Army, beat Navy.
Having said that, USN would whip that ass without even breaking a sweat.
Love my squid friends, signed Army Puke.
Hey you know what they say, the only two branches are the Army and the Navy. The Air Force is a corporation and the Marines are a cult.
For those who are not familiar with operation praying mantis, here is my favorite video the breaks it down in about 15 minutes.
Bringing a knife to a gun fight seems like a weird move
Unless the goal is igniting regional passions in hopes of bringing some biblical end of the world, I don't really see the end game here.
Solidifying control over the Suez Canal - note that Saudis and Iran are (at least for now) not at their throats so some or other kind of cooperation for mutual trade profits may be in order. Their agreement was brokered by China, and the Chinese are very much interested in keeping Suez open. For the local powers the best case scenario is to make westerners GTFO. But the westerners won't gtfo as long as their ships are under fire. It's not unlikely that Houthi got "off the leash", in such case the Iranian warship would paradixically sail there to discipline the attackers and reduce tensions. Howevwr obviously no one would admit it openly.
A more conspirational take is that the heat in the ME, from Hamas to Houthi, is a bid to pressure the US into unpopular moves (stubborn support to Israel, actual violence on the seas, maybe some diplomatic fuckups) and produce an electoral advantage for Trump.
Why would Iran want Trump??
Probably because he's not really interested in what's happening outside of his country, and can't place Iran on a map anyway.
That's just a bad take, he spent most of his term doing dick measuring contests with Iran/NK/China. To say he doesn't care about foreign policy is a complete lie, he absolutely cares about the rest of the world insofar as it demonstrates his "strength" as a "powerful leader."
Plus the last time we had an altercation with Iran during his presidency we almost went to war over it, we were on ready 30's on deployment the whole week just in case the declaration of war was dropped.
Unless Iran's goal is to drag us into war, there's no way they'd prefer a Trump presidency.
He’s got a Sharpie and is not afraid to use it on a world map!
I can't speak for any of the information the other user posted, but Iran and Russia are allies when it comes to military. If Trump comes in, he is pro Russia, anti Ukraine.
Edit: can someone explain the downvotes? Are they saying Iran is not a military ally of Russia, or that Trump is not pro Russia anto Ukraine? Honest question
Because while his short term rhetoric is anti-Iran, the long-term outcome of a Trump-led kakistocracy will benefit them.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
An Iranian warship sailed into the Red Sea Monday, according to Iranian state media and other reports, risking a potential escalation of tensions in waters where attacks on commercial shipping are becoming frequent and forcing navies to intervene.
The arrival of the Iranian vessel, the frigate Alborz, in the Red Sea comes amid an ongoing conflict that started with Israel and Hamas but has spread to involve the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels, among others.
Following weeks of American warships shooting down Houthi threats, such as missiles and drones, US Navy helicopters on Sunday fired on and destroyed three Houthi attack boats attempting to board a Maersk cargo ship.
Maersk has paused sailing through the Red Sea for 48 hours starting Sunday in response to the attack.
As of Dec. 17, US Navy destroyer USS Carney had neutralized dozens of airborne threats originating from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen since arriving in the area, making the American vessel 36-0 against Houthi rebels.
The aggressive Houthi activities in the Red Sea are threatening global commerce and have caused shipping giants like Maersk to look to other waterways and pause transit through the critical trade route.
The original article contains 252 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 24%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
We really don't like it when you fuck with our boats, guys. Quit it before things get really Proportional.
Not even ours, just random ass vessels from around the world, like India and France. I'm no maritime law expert, but taking over other people's trading ships in international waters sounds a hell of a lot like piracy. Someone's glock 34 is about to shiver some timbers, lol. Or a lot more than a glock.
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
196 points (98.0% liked)
World News
38979 readers
2337 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS