Great way to demonstrate that you are fit to roam free in society. Idiot.
Instead, lock this clearly deeply disturbed individual in with others, best in an overcrowded environment with severe staff shortage, afterwards watch what happens. It's contagious. As long as he wasn't born with a physical brain defect, this individual wasn't born stupidly violent either.
What would you suggest should be done?
Great question.
What are the realistic alternatives to incarceration?
It’s true that a relatively small percentage of offenders will require a custodial sentence for the benefit of society as that is the safest place to manage them but, for the majority of offenders this will do more harm than good. Correctional centres are criminogenic [1].(https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=criminaljustice_facpubs)
Instead, society more broadly needs to treat the root cause of a lot of crime, which is, that crime is a socioeconomic problem.
By properly funding a social safety net, including job programs, housing and education for vulnerable people (yes, criminals are actually vulnerable people) you would see a reduction in crime and criminal behaviour.
Say that this doesn’t satisfy your Old Testament lust for vengeance though? You need a pound of flesh? In that case correctional facilities that actually function to rehabilitate do exist and don’t have to be punitive and inhumane. I could point to Nordic examples but the reality is any centre that has programs designed and implemented to actually be therapeutic and a safe environment would be better than the current status quo.
This again though requires significant state investment and will mean that the for-profit correctional industry ceases to exist. It is a bad idea to profit from incarceration as it sets up perverse incentives. Why would a private prison want to rehabilitate people? It would put them out of business.
There are plenty of other options as well, diversionary sentencing, community courts, restorative justice etc etc but this should hopefully give you a flavour of the very well understood solutions to this problem.
Are you squints suggesting he be put in solitary instead? That seems brutally overblown and drastic.
Nah they're just commenting on the awful state of the US prison system
Ding ding ding!
Insanity play? Like, wouldn't even be that hard to say dude has Advanced Delusionary Schizophrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage?
Sure, if he'd rather a guarantee of never leaving prison - which, to be fair, it does sound like he's gunning for.
Jesus, he leaped at her!
Gotta admit, it was an impressive jump.
That thumbnail lol. That mf got AIR
That’ll fix things for him for sure!
"It’s a bold move, Cotton. Let's see how it plays out."
Probably ten years, seven minimum with a $10k fine plus court costs on the assault alone. Additional five years likely with all of the contempt of the court and related charges. Then again, he was denied bail for his prior so he might fall in NRS 207.010 which would put him into Class A felony territory. Which then that would be ten minimum with max twenty-five years.
Either way, he's going to be getting plenty of time for self reflection. Last I checked Judges tend to not like that kind of stuff in their court.
That will help at his parole hearings fo sho
He was being sentenced for aggravated battery? It can't possibly be true!
Yeah, I was certain it was going to be embezzling from a bank
It must be tough to be a judge. Here's the video of what led up to the guy leaping at her. He's explaining why he thinks he doesn't need to be locked up. To me, he says all the right things: he didn't realize he had a problem but he was shown he has a mental health issue. Here's gotten help for it and he's much better now, he only wants to do good and he doesn't have authority issues, etc. He seems meek and humble. Then the judge says she thinks he needs to face some consequences and she's going to deny the request and he loses it and leaps onto her and starts beating on her. So clearly he still has some pretty serious issues. How do you tell?
How do u tell??? Lmfao. You born yesterday.
3 felonies 9 misdemeanors and multiple dvs
The judge knew. Bailiffs got caught slipping. Watch the full video. He whips the bailiffs ass with a few good ones before they get him down fully.
Lol that dude in the back hammer fisting his butt and back. 🤣
I mean this is a terrible thing and all, but, since it sounds like everyone is generally ok, there are many parts of this that are hilarious. And I know people got hurt here, and I think that's bad, but I think it's possible to see the humorous absurd while also recognizing and condemning the violent and sad.
That dude was straight planking in midair for one. I mean he went full send on that leap!
I'll show you who's not fit for probation!
Those bailiffs need to be fired
Three time felon. He was probably going in for the rest of his life anyway. This was a calculated move, and he would have killed her if he could have I'm sure. What else does he have to lose but his life? He probably doesn't care about that either. I don't condone it but I think I understand what goes through the heads of society's garbage bin citizens.
wrong state for that. he was gonna get a couple years at best.
Video doesn't play, lol.
Comments in this post have a YouTube link. I had to watch it that way
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.