542
submitted 11 months ago by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 106 points 11 months ago

You forgot the homeless people, forced to live under that interchange because you know, america, freedom etc...

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago

If they are lucky enough that nobody installed some hostile architecture there to keep them out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 50 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Duh, moron, the future is you just live in the car.

You cant legally park it anywhere near anything useful for survival, and gas is expensive and so is car insurance.

But thats fine because cars and car companies have more rights than people! Or something...

What I am saying is anyone who walks to the grocery store /deserves/ to get run over.

Natural Selection mannnnn!

inhales

Alright, feelin good, got beer in the glove compartment, time to film my magnum opus:

DeathRace 2024.

YEEEEEHAAAWWW!!!

immediately peels out, doesnt see other driver blowing a red light until too late, swerves to avoid and crashes into the weed dispensary, paralyzing himself from the legs down and killing 4 others

[-] greybeard@lemmy.one 15 points 11 months ago

In many cities, people are literally living in cars that don't run, in public parking spaces, because it's the only enclosed place they can afford to live in.

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Yep, and that is almost always illegal, and such people almost always end up having the car towed, having to pay for the car being towed, losing all their possessions and then becoming homeless.

Its just a matter of time until enough people report it and the police get around to it.

[-] hackris@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago

Capitalist wet dream right here

[-] vexikron@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

cue America Fuck Yeah! song

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This isn't a great argument. There is so much open undeveloped space in the US that could be used to house people. This interchange isn't taking space away from anyone. There are lots of good reasons to reduce cars, but this isn't one of them.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 99 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That’s not really true here though. This is in the middle of an urban area, not in some big open empty space that’s unoccupied, like Montana, or North Dakota. This is in the middle of Houston, Texas, a very populous city.

load more comments (45 replies)
[-] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

I think OP's argument is that the interchange is a symptom of low density urban sprawl and all the associated maladies that come with it.

[-] LovesTha@floss.social 13 points 11 months ago

@Anarch157a @BradleyUffner Yeah, it'd suck trying to walk to a friends house on the other side of the interchange.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, but you can't get to the other side of Siena in 20 seconds? Efficiency isn't pretty.

/S (big a for big sarcasm)

[-] LovesTha@floss.social 15 points 11 months ago

@eya This is such a weird way to compare countries anyway, Italy has giant interchanges too: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.929109,12.7359436,1733m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu

[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago

Because it's not meant to compare countries, it's meant to compare sizes. That interchange could be replaced with any interchange of similar size.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maganra@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Ah Houston, not a whole lot to like about living here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 10 points 11 months ago

bUt wE hAve EnoUGh sPaCE!

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 9 points 11 months ago

Well damn start building apartments in the empty parts. Its not that difficult to understand.

[-] spacesatan@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

With 6inch thick windows or intolerable noise pollution, sounds great. I wonder which one penny pinching developers are going to build.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Even better: Leaving that land undeveloped and natural, instead of cramming humans or cars on it

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 34 points 11 months ago

People need to live somewhere, and if they live somewhere like Siena it leaves more space for nature.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah, and the nicer urbanists can make cities the more empty land there will be. And I can live in a pile of rocks with animals for my friends while you all enjoy the nice cities.

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Humans need land to live on. Constructng densely reduces the land needed for humans, leaving more undeveloped land.

Reducing human population is beyond the scope of urban planning.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

The last sentence could be argued as north american roads become more deadly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Hell Yeah! Deer and rabbits have to live somewhere too. I wish I lived 15 min. from undisturbed nature!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
542 points (92.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9870 readers
14 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS