56
submitted 8 months ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

that's great, but is it forklift certified?

[-] parallax@local106.com 5 points 8 months ago

Asking the real questions.

[-] throwawayish@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Oh wow! This is excellent news! I hope they'll also provide other privacy/security related features like Heads, the removal of the camera and/or microphone modules, pre-installed privacy screen, tamper-evident screws and packaging.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It says it has coreboot pre installed. I assume therefore its not difficult to flash Heads, which is based on coreboot?

[-] throwawayish@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Honestly, I don't know if that's the case; I always got scared whenever I saw the prerequisites for Heads in combination with the strict list of supported hardware. FWIW, the NV41 that's used for enabling Heads on NovaCustom's device is included in the short list of supported hardware for Heads, while -unfortunately- the same doesn't apply to the StarBook. I would love to be proven wrong though!

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 3 points 8 months ago

Looks like a Purism. Is it any better?

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If I cared about Qubes, Intel would be an instant dealbreaker. Same as it was for Framework.

[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago

To be fair, if you're referring to the "alleged" backdoors in Intel processes, there's pretty similar stuff going on in the AMD side too. That said, I still totally get not wanting to support Intel since they're definitely the shadiest of the two, and they've been awful value these days.

The Framework 13 AMD is pretty great though, can confirm. It's all I've ever wanted in a decent, repairable laptop.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago

No I'm just referring to the horrible inefficiency

[-] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Can you explain a little bit? Which backdoors are you worried about with Qubes?

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago

Historically speaking, IME has been a low hanging fruit of attack vectors and intel has arguably speaking had worse problems with security vulnerabilities on hardware and firmware levels than say AMD or ARM. A bit anecdotal, but there you are.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

Star Labs disable IME by default.

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

AMD and ARM also have their remote standards, but none as distrusted as IME.

Also, remember that vulnerability where IME could be enabled through the internet by a malicious actor? That was fun...

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

I didn't say anything about backdoors...

Intel mobile chips just blow and have for several years now

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

47344 readers
1192 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS