316
submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/3337820

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/PCGaming/t/341789

This video is not monetized. This video covers our serious concerns regarding the data accuracy of Linus Media Group, including Linus Tech Tips, ShortCircuit, and TechQuickie, particularly as it relates to rushing content out the door to favor -- by staff's own admission -- quantity over quality. As the company continues to expand into its LTT Labs direction, the importance of accurate data increases; however, even as 'only' entertainment, there are still certain responsibilities to the consumer and the manufacturers to report fairly (and to have defined corrections processes in place). We tried to approach this as objectively as possible and hope that viewers are able to listen to the evidence we present, particularly as it relates to significant and frequent data errors that now present in nearly every technical review video.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nucelar@kbin.social 92 points 1 year ago

It is the slow boiling frog story. Linus would have called out himself some years ago for this, but now he does not have time for that. They have to pump content to keep it rolling and get more equipment; they cannot stop now. They could not see this as an issue because they have slowly transitioned to this, but they are now locked into this rhythm. Hopefully, they can pivot out of this, and hopefully, they hiring of a new CEO was special because they already saw this problem.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

There's a big part of this that's just his ego though. The self-imposed release schedule is bad, but ultimately his inability to truly admit he was wrong is what will ultimately undo the company.

I was enthusiastic about LTT Labs - there are many areas that reviewers can't explore because of the complicated and expensive testing setups required, such as objective measurements on whether a phone has a good antenna or not. But at this point I'm not sure how we would ever be able to trust what they produce.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

That's my big worry. The company is now too big and too expensive to slow down. There's a real possibility that this mess results in mass layoffs at LMG, either because public backlash kills their profitability or they accept how screwed up they are and slow down and take some time to fix things and this results in a drop in output that means they can no longer afford their current scale. I don't know how much runway they have. And in that scenario it's the most vulnerable employees and not the problem-people in leadership who'd be facing the music, which is awful.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like I said in a Beehaw comment about the video, LMG needs to vastly improve their Quality Assurance process if they want their new "Labs" initiative to hold weight. I've watched LTT with friends more for the entertainment and taken the data with a grain of salt.

It's clear they need to slow down to review more carefully, whether that's by lengthening release rate and schedules, or by hiring more staff to spread out across projects.

Steve and Gamers Nexus were just putting together what the community already told Linus and co. Linus and his staff were clearly well aware that there is intense pressure to release on timelines that don't allow for proper checking at filming time and allow mistakes to pass through. This is from their own LMG produced videos, not taken substantially out of context.

So from the above I don't buy Linus' claims that Steve could or should have discussed this privately or anything. Steve is only bringing it up in this way because they have, to some extent, been wilfully ignoring these issues that are right in front of them and a chat with GN likely wouldn't have changed that. Why? My reasoning is recommendations to slow down the rate of release aren't good for business.

I've always appreciated GN's methodology and they pride themselves on holding a high ethical standard for their technical reviews. Not everyone can easily reach that same standard but the onus is on LMG to show that their tests are trustworthy and that starts with diligent, researched information, testing and good Quality Control.

(I won't touch on the Billet issue besides LMG fucked up on that and Linus needs to work that out with Billet directly and apologize).

[-] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 53 points 1 year ago

The Billet Labs incident crossed the line. That's not something you can just apologize or pay your way out of.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] harrim4n@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

In his forum post he commented somewhere in the thread that billet sent them a quote and they paid in full - so at least that part should be resolved. Still a massive fuckup though.

[-] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

According to the new video that's a lie, and they didn't reach out at all until after this video was posted, they made an offer but billet has not yet responded to it or accepted it.

[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Nah in the forum post he said they haven't paid BL anything yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MortyMcFry@aussie.zone 32 points 1 year ago

LTT has always seemed like a profit driven channel. No real reviews. MKBHD is 50/50

[-] doctor_han@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Are there such thing as non-profit driven review channels?

[-] RQG@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You can try to make a profit without if being your main focus I guess. There are the channels which review and take all the free samples they get and try to pump out a review on time no matter the quality to generate as many views as possible.

And then there are a few review channels who will put out their review when it is ready and good. Who will give away review copies if allowed. Those reviewers would call out shit even if it means being locked out of review copies next time. Which of course means less profit. There are even review channels which do not do sponsored ad segments. Instead they'd be relying on viewer support. But there aren't many of those.

[-] Afrazzle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

LTT marketing themselves as a Canadian company/channel but using only US prices and availability was always a red flag for me.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you operate any sort of international business (LTT store products are made in China) the US dollar is the currency you use. Their costs are all in USD so if they used CAD for pricing they would just be constantly jumping around with the exchange rate to make sure margins stayed constant.

[-] Afrazzle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I'm talking about for videos along the lines of "$500 build guide" not for their merch.

[-] GameGod@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

The logic still applies. If you price something in CAD for a US or international audience, you might as well price it in beans because nobody's going to have any idea how much it costs. Think of LTT as an Canadian exporter of video content.

[-] Afrazzle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Thinking of it that way makes sense, but it doesn't change the fact that they were (idk if they still are, stopped watching years ago) advertising themselves as Canadian content creators, with a fair bit of emphasis on being Canadian. As far as I could tell they were trying to appeal to Canadians by pushing that angle, however their videos used US pricing and availability which may as well have been in beans because it means nothing to me.

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Canada is tiny. They probably receive only 5% of their views from their home country.

[-] Fogle@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

They should still have a Canadian price storefront

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Or, at the very least, a built-in currency conversion.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why? It's a business and they go where the money is. I don't mind LTT thinking like a business - everybody's gotta eat. But the screw-ups with Billet aren't okay and the incredibly hostile workplace described on Xitter is beyond the pale.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Didn't he even make a video where he talked about he wants to stop pushing expensive shit to people, but then he didn't because he's just a money hungry twat? I never got the appeal and found him beyond annoying. So this is just great bews, maybe his videos will stop showing up everywhere.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mkbhd gets paid for nearly everything on his channel but he also doesn't tell you to go out and buy or not buy shit based on lies

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every large channel, and most small channels that aren't explicitly charities, are profit-driven. I'd actually say being visibly profit-driven is usually a good sign because it means you know where their money comes from. What's worse is when you don't know who's funding them -- that's when you get paid misinformation peddlers.

Media is a business. If you're not their paying customer, you're the product. That's why stuff like Patreon and LTT's paid merch is a good thing.

The real problems are that the company runs in an extremely, dangerously unprofessional way - well beyond normal startup mayhem. Combine that with the break-neck pace they try to put out content, and the fact that Linus himself has an ego the size of Cleveland, and it means that they're a danger to themselves and others. And Linus taking every problem personally means the company can't change properly. He needs to take a leave of absence and bring in some dispassionate experts fix things at his company, and when he comes back he's just another employee who does things by the book and lets the CEO run things under the new model until he learns the ropes.

But I worry that the company is screwed regardless - they might not be able to come back from this, and even if they can the loss of revenue might exceed their operating costs and runway. For Linus himself and the rest of the leadership? Good. That's appropriate comeuppance. But it's a big group, and that will probably mean layoffs, and I feel bad for the people at the bottom who'll be hit by the shit rolling downhill.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 28 points 1 year ago

I've been watching his channel since ~ the Langley house days. But the video where they painted a PC black and basically immersed a GPU in paint until they killed it was the day I realized that they were more concerned about pumping out videos than content itself.

The days of me wading through bad videos to find one high quality video are long over. I miss the older days when they focused on quality, 30+ minute videos and guides.

[-] TheObserver@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

One thing i noticed is when they review a really shitty product but don't bash it??? Like you guys said you would but you're just beating around the bush. It's either a good product or not. No need for the run around guys. Take for example shortcircuit i believe was the channel they had a shitty expensive leather mouse but the person reviewing it was clearly not giving his honest opinion. The mouse was shit plain and simple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow. I always thought Linus was a good guy (haven't really watched his channel properly in years) but I'm sad to learn that he's now also a piece of shit!

EDIT: Fuck all of you pricks that downvoted me; I was right after all, Linus really is a fucking piece of shit - full thread here

Linus piece of shit

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I would go that far. I largely agree with the GN video, but I would not call Linus a piece of shit. There are a number of things I disagree with Linus about on a fundamental level, but he is still just a slightly awkward nerd with methed up squirrel energy at the end of the day. As Steve notes in the video he is basically responsible for the livelihood of 120 people, I'm sure that puts a little bit of stress on a person. That being said it doesn't absolve him of what has been happening, and his current path seems deeply misguided.

[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He's replied in his forums and has basically doubled down. It would have been different if he took some responsibility.

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Oh I'm aware. He has always struck me as very quick to react and slow to introspect (which is kinda inline with not having time to look back like was said in his team's video). I definitely have issues with some of his philosophies, but on a scale from regular person to Hollywood CEO he doesn't strike me as actively malicious, just misguided.

Just my $0.02. I understand where you are coming from, just figured I'd proffer another perspective for the sake of discussion.

[-] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You raise good points and I would agree with you if not for the Billet Labs situation - here is a link to another comment explaining what went down.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
316 points (91.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8533 readers
1014 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS