39
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Zerodya@lemm.ee to c/unixporn@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zerodya@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

WM: Hyprland

  • Bar: Waybar
  • Launcher: Bemenu + j4-dmenu-desktop
  • Powermenu: Wofi
  • Notifications: Mako
  • GTK color scheme: adwaita with custom preset

Terminal: Kitty

  • Shell: Fish
  • Prompt: starship

dots | wallpaper

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Any advantages of Artix over Arch? I always see people always say it's arch with a different init system, but all I see in terms of practical benefit is supposedly faster bootup times (yet for some reason my configured NixOS (systemd) was booting faster than Alpine?) If the only advantages are supposedly faster startup times (which I couldn't replicate) and adhering to the unix philosophy of doing one thing and doing it well, as well as minimalism, then let me tell you, somethung far cooler would have been replacing everything possible with systemd.

[-] Zerodya@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It really is just Arch with a different init system. There are no noticeable major differences. The faster bootup times are probably negligible.

Of course I like the idea of minimalism and the unix philosophy, but the reason I chose Artix isn't so philosophic. I was already using Arch on my laptop and wanted to install it on my desktop, but I enjoy trying to do harder things and learning in the process, so I ended up learning how to use a different init system.. and I also did it because I liked the Artix logo better lol.

I'm very happy with both Artix and Arch and while I wish systemd wasn't almost a monopoly, at the end of the day everyone is free to use what they want as long as it doesn't hurt the linux ecosystem for others.

[-] starman@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

That workspace indicator looks really nice

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Another starship user, can you elaborate why you are not using something like tide when using fish shell? Whats the appeal or advantage of starship? I feel the default layouts are boring and ugly. Is it the customize ability?

[-] Zerodya@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The default layout is what feels comfortable to me and I chose starfish because I used to use starship with zsh, so I went with something I was familiar with and didn't think too much about it.

I didn't even know about tide until now but after a quick look I can't find any groundbreaking differences in the layouts compared to starfish.

[-] LibertyBeta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can Chime in. I use starship so all my shells are the same, and because it's fash as a greased weasel. Rust has advantages.

That said, I tide looks interesting as it's a native prompt.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

unixporn

4251 readers
38 users here now

unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make ricers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No
  3. Busy
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS