this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
500 points (99.8% liked)

196

18095 readers
726 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] feebl@feddit.nl 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's like 2 typos and I think it's pretty obvious that the user knows how to spell the words and just mistyped.

[–] Neil@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I count at least 5.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fuck apple so hard for killing this culture.

[–] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think it was all the guys airdropping people dick pics in public places that killed it

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Fuck apple so hard for killing this culture

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

still possible in android, you can permanently activate nearby share.

i know it's not the same. we need a universal standard for this shit already. sharing files between devices is a nightmare.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We need a WiFi standard that isn’t fucking bullshit (has cryptographic identity), and that can be expanded to devices too.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Using the local network for the connection is a garbage plan because Wi-Fi coverage and availability is not consistent enough to become mainstream. I am aware of two practical solutions for this: instant hotspot (assuming the sharing app can temporarily reconfigure the wifi settings, and wifi encryption keys can be transferred with a QR code) or OnionShare (uses TOR to make a sharable link using any firewall/NAT configuration, share the link with a QR code).

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don’t need to use TCPIP with WiFi. It can be ad-hoc and some other protocol.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah I just researched and learned about wifi direct

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By “WiFi” I mean the wireless protocol, which is confusing because that includes Bluetooth.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...b-but I hate Bluetooth with a passion...

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago

That’s the data on top of it. Some sort of universal sharing protocol would have some kind of broadcast, either over a LAN or over the air, then there would be a handshake which would exchange MACs and cryptographic keys, then the actual exchange of data.

It would have nothing to do with Bluetooth, it would just use the 802.11 public use bands.

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

Nearby share is Googles proprietary protocol

[–] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

well, localshare works well if you don't mind having to find a local network with multicast (or using tethering)

that requires every participant to reconfigure their Wi-Fi settings to connect to a participant's hotspot. Not simple enough to substitute Air-drop unless there's an app to do this automatically.