174
submitted 10 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/usa@lemmy.ml

The 9th Circuit compared the searches to the “abuses of power” that “led to adoption of the Fourth Amendment in the first place.”


The FBI overstepped its constitutional authority when agents searched hundreds of safe deposit boxes without warrants in 2021, a federal appeals court ruled. The court compared the FBI’s tactics to the kind of indiscriminate searches that led to the enactment of the Bill of Rights in the first place.

In March 2021, the FBI raided U.S. Private Vaults, a safe deposit box company in Beverly Hills, California. The company marketed its services around client anonymity and privacy, which appealed to gambling rings and drug operations, but also customers who were unable to get a deposit box at their bank or simply mistrusted banks and preferred to store their valuables elsewhere.

The FBI seized millions of dollars in cash from the deposit boxes, plus a mix of jewelry, personal effects, and documents such as wills and prenuptial agreements.

In litigation filed in federal district court in May 2021, victims of the raid argued that the FBI’s search “flagrantly” violated their Fourth Amendment rights. In October 2022, the trial judge ruled there was no Fourth Amendment violation.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the lower court’s decision on Tuesday. The court ruled that the FBI exceeded the bounds of a warrant obtained prior to the raid, which explicitly did not authorize any “criminal search or seizure” of the boxes’ actual contents.

The FBI’s warrant application omitted key details of the raid plan, including that the special agent in charge had directed agents to open every box, preserve fingerprint evidence, inventory the contents, and have drug dogs sniff all cash.

“If there remained any doubt regarding whether the government conducted a ‘criminal search or seizure,’” the 9th Circuit ruled, “that doubt is put to rest by the fact the government has already used some of the information from inside the boxes to obtain additional warrants to further its investigation and begin new ones.”

read more: https://theintercept.com/2024/01/24/fbi-raid-fourth-amendment/

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

ALL warrantless searches are overstepping authority, and violating the Constitution too.

[-] eRac 4 points 10 months ago

The headline is a bit misleading. The appeals court ruled that they didn't have a warrant to search the boxes, which is an important distinction since they did have a warrant to search the business that housed them. They got a warrant to search the building, then used that to seize the property of clients and open investigations against them.

[-] centof@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

Reminder that FBI was behind COINTELPRO, the organized attack on basically any left wing org in the country. And they continue to use very similar tactics to this day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

https://www.zinnedproject.org/if-we-knew-our-history/fbi-war-civil-rights-movement/

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

Surely not the FBI?! Well at any rate, we can all sleep soundly knowing the affected parties will gain suitable remuneration via the civil court system.

/s

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 10 months ago

ACAB includes feds.

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

When the authority is committing the crimes, it erodes trust and emboldens society to also commit crimes. The FBI are fools and are undermining the very country they are supposed to be protecting. I hope some heads roll here and not just a slap in the wrist as this is not good.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

This ruling is generally good, but seems toothless. 3 years ago a bunch of "allegedly" bad people lost many of their personal affects and the FBI probably got to obtain hundreds of additional warrants and evidence not to mention information about those people. The "special agent" will suffer no consequences, neither will any of the officers involved in the raid, and I'm sure nothing they stole will ever be returned to the victims. So what is the point?

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For one, nothing they seized will be admissible in court, and anyone who was convinced based on that search can appeal their conviction.

It's not nothing to those effected

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

The warrants we got told us explicitly not to seize the vaults or its contents and we did anyways? Haha, my bad!

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 1 points 10 months ago

I thought the point was that you needed two keys to open it, right? Are there any safety deposit boxes that are physically safe?

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Thats in a bank. These aren't traditional boxes I think

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Even the most secure vaults are rated by how long it takes a locksmith to open them.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure, but this is a bank. You're literally paying them to protect your shit. They have armed guards to protect their vaults.

What's the point of paying them if they give someone enough time to pick their locks before using violence against them?

[-] autotldr 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The FBI overstepped its constitutional authority when agents searched hundreds of safe deposit boxes without warrants in 2021, a federal appeals court ruled.

The FBI seized millions of dollars in cash from the deposit boxes, plus a mix of jewelry, personal effects, and documents such as wills and prenuptial agreements.

In litigation filed in federal district court in May 2021, victims of the raid argued that the FBI’s search “flagrantly” violated their Fourth Amendment rights.

The court ruled that the FBI exceeded the bounds of a warrant obtained prior to the raid, which explicitly did not authorize any “criminal search or seizure” of the boxes’ actual contents.

The government had fought against destruction of the records for more than two years, and plaintiffs’ attorneys were surprised by the about-face, which they called an attempt to “sweep a massive constitutional violation under the rug.”

On Tuesday, the 9th Circuit issued the ruling the government feared, while also ordering the FBI to destroy records of the search, including copies in its evidence databases.


The original article contains 731 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
174 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
135 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS