109
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

FULLERTON, California (Reuters) - A generation of children who learned to write on screens is now going old school.

Starting this year, California grade school students are required to learn cursive handwriting, after the skill had fallen out of fashion in the computer age.

Assembly Bill 446, sponsored by former elementary school teacher Sharon Quirk-Silva and signed into law in October, requires handwriting instruction for the 2.6 million Californians in grades one to six, roughly ages 6 to 12, and cursive lessons for the "appropriate" grade levels - generally considered to be third grade and above.

Experts say learning cursive improves cognitive development, reading comprehension and fine motor skills, among other benefits. Some educators also find value in teaching children to read historic documents and family letters from generations past.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As a left-handed kid in school, cursive was a bit of a nightmare.

As a student of history who has seen countless beautiful examples of medieval calligraphy, chancery scripts, and renaissance typography, modern school cursive is a fucking abomination. It was developed neither for speed nor beauty nor legibility, but to reduce the amount of ink dripping from cheap dip pens when they were lifted from the page between strokes.

The danger in making a virtue of necessity is that some people will continue to fetishize it long after the necessity has passed.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

I never knew that. It’s interesting, thanks!

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That's really interesting to know. Do you have any particular sources you'd recommend for further reading?

[-] Cat@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I'm 40 and our teacher explained why cursive was a thing in elementary school. I figured we were learning it so we could sign our name.

Take computers out of the picture. How long have we been using ballpoint pens? Cursive was obsolete even before computers took over how we write.

[-] ThrowawayInTheYear23@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

It was worthless back in the 90s.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] assembly@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

There has to be a better and more useful way to achieve those benefits than cursive writing. Maybe we expand art classes as opposed to this? Maybe cursive writing is just taught as more like calligraphy in an art class? I don’t see a value or learning cursive in like English class. I’m old though so had to learn it and in the over 40 years of knowing cursive the only time I use it or read it is my signature.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

There is

former elementary school teacher Sharon Quirk-Silva

Probably another old person who just can't let the damn thing go.

I learned cursive in the 3rd grade, the amount of times I've needed it (beyond a signature, even then it's just a squiggle) is a whopping 0

It would be much more suitable in a separate optional class like you said, a calligraphy class or more budget for art classes (Which is far more important IMO)

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

There's no arguement for teaching cursive outside of old people's sentimentality, and that's worthless

[-] Mesophar@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

That's a huge shame, because cursive is my standard handwriting for any note taking or long form writing. It feels less strenuous on my hand, and looks neater. I use print writing for short notes or to fill in fields on documents, but everything else looks so much nicer to me in cursive script.

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

As another commenter noted it would be a fun elective class to take or possibly we should bring back short form classes. I never had short form class but my mom took it in the 60s? And uses it. Like a right angle represents “and” or something. That would be super useful and more so than cursive.

[-] Mesophar@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

I agree short form and other note-taking methods, typing, etc should be rolled into a single course. I don't think it should be elective, but that's just me.

I appreciate having learned cursive to open up historical documents, published diaries, and the like. Plus, I could read the letters and cards my grandmother sent me.

But, I never had any issue learning to read or write cursive. A lot of people talk about those lessons being difficult or grueling in school, and that wasn't my experience at all. It was just a nifty skill I learned alongside plenty of other skills that may or may not have use in every day life as an adult.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Around 3rd or 4th grade in the mid-2000s I learned cursive and also have never used it outside of pretty much just using it for my signature. It's definitely something that isn't all that useful outside of signatures anymore, and even then, it's becoming less relevant when you can't write worth a damn on those electric signature rectangle things.

Though, I completely agree that expanding it by adding it to an art class in the form of calligraphy would be an amazing way to both learn cursive and make it more enjoyable.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago

I find cursive to be far less readable than small caps architectural and engineering drafting handwriting. I wish that were taught from a young age.

Why have personalized handwriting when you can have 100% legible block text at all times with zero ambiguity?!

[-] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Do you mean to say you would rather teach the children to write like a dad?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Wow, even California is back to legalizing child abuse.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was in school in the 80's and 90's. We had to exclusively use cursive from grades 3 (I think) through 8. I hated every second and most looked forward to high school because I knew I'd never use cursive again.

I've especially always had this irrational distaste for the cursive letter b.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Please no. Cursive fucking sucks. This is not something we should bring back. Let it die for fucks sake

[-] JudiDench@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

I think reading cursive should be required, but writing cursive? I'm just happy if kids can develop neat standard handwriting (printing).

[-] athos77@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

learning cursive improves cognitive development, reading comprehension and fine motor skills, among other benefits.

There've been studies saying this for a couple decades at least.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

If those are desired results, what other activities produces the same result?

Lots of those benefits seems like they might be derived from playing certain video games. Assuming the peer-reviewed research supports that, shouldn't that be considered too?

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pirrrrrrrr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Have there been? Link them.

Because I call bullshit on that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] catarina@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

This is so alien to me, do other Europeans struggle with cursive? Is it a geography or an age thing?
Personally, it feels like a natural way to write and link letters quickly. I think it's taught in a backwards way, and a lot of people never develop their calligraphy skills because of that, but once you understand the point of cursive, it makes sense. And it's one more way to express yourself. It can be as legible/ambiguous as you want to make it. You can add fancy ligatures, or keep it clean.

[-] pirrrrrrrr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've always struggled with it. Often people let it degrade into a line with tiny bumps, and it becomes illegible.

Personally I am Autistic and have ADHD, so the fine motor control is hard to manage. I can't write cursive neatly, but if I slow right down I can "draw" cursive.

Growing up undiagnosed when I did, has developed a hardy set of calluses across the knuckles from teachers hitting them with a ruler for bad pen grip or messy writing.

Most of those fuckers are dead or in diapers now.

[-] catarina@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Damn, that's a terrible experience, I am truly sorry you went through all that. Those teachers are the dregs, fuck them.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Fuck cursive, just let it die old people

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

There are times I have to present in meetings and share my computer screen, so I can’t really take notes using my laptop.

I learned cursive & it enables me to take faster hand-written notes as people comment or ask questions. That’s just a personal anecdote, I know, but fwiw I do use it on a regular basis but I realize that’s not applicable to most folks.

[-] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I really like hand written notes, especially since I can draw whatever I may need to help supplement the notes (graphs/arrows/boxes). Writing in print is so much slower and tiring than cursive, I will do whatever I can to not write in print. Also, I find my handwriting in cursive is far neater than print. I'm not sure the extent others can read it and am disappointed computers have a much harder time reading cursive into text.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] maness300@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What a fat waste of time!

If my kids had to do this, I'd just tell them to ignore the lessons and take a nap.

If the teachers have a problem, they can call me :)

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The comments here are the kind of visceral reaction to cursive that I only ever saw online and in english, makes me think it's mostly from the USA thanks to the location of the news.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Improved reading comprehension

I suppose if you don't know cursive, you can't read it and that would put a damper on your ability to comprehend it if you can't even read it.

And fine motor skills

If you write legibly, it might. Cant comprehend if I can't read it, and I can't read it 90% of the time because whoever wrote it has crappy penmanship since they just wrote big flowing loops or tiny little scribbles instead of words that can be read by human eyes.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The issue with not being able to at least read cursive handwriting is receiving a letter or looking at an old document and/or signatures written in cursive, in perfect English, and being like, "I don't know what this says."

It's like having a mild illiteracy. Pointless or not, I'd feel like an idiot if I couldn't decipher these common things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
109 points (91.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
3895 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS