311
submitted 1 year ago by Pips@lemmy.film to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Most of these comments are people recommending bottled water or various filtration methods, both of which could work in varying degrees. Let’s not miss the point that people who will be most impacted are low income and might struggle to pay their tap water bill. Bottled water and filters are a stretch for those folks. The true fix is demanding more of our politicians to hold polluters accountable and push for better treatment of the tap water.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Aren't people paying taxes?

No idea why people would rather spend more money than to hold the government accountable to fix the services they pay for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reddit_was_fun@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I live in the Cape Fear area of North Carolina and we are dealing with this. Chemors, the maker of Teflon, has been dumping PFAS in our water.

My town recently built a reverse osmosis water treatment plant. It is the only way to get it out of the water. Traditional water filters don’t work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrisvegasLukass@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Bottled water is the fucking problem. Don't whinge about anything climate based if you recommend plastic. The disconnect on solving contaminated water with plastic water bottles s mind boggling.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

If you don't have a water source very close plastic beats glass very fast.

Glass is so much heavier that the additional fuel to transport it over 100km offsets whatever emissions plastic creates.

This is the classic "no good option" dilemma depending where you live.

In many parts of Europe you can buy the locally sourced water from glass bottles - but it doesn't make much sense buying glass bottles for climate change reasons otherwise

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know much about this but wouldn't a water filter be better?

We have great municipal water so I have never used one, but it at least sounds better than buying bottled water.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah using the local tap water and adding a water filter if necessary is the best option for sure

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

As long as the companies providing the water a) make more than enough profits and b) are not held accountable, why should they do anything about it?

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Because it's morally right? But I get your point and understand the question isn't meant to be answered.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Morally right" does neither rise the shareholders profits nor the managers bonus.

[-] robbotlove@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Know your enemy!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
311 points (97.3% liked)

News

23268 readers
2589 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS