639
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

National security officials are used to shaking off absurd conspiracy theories, but the latest rumor that’s gripped MAGA world just hits different.

The claims by Fox News and far-right influencers that pop star Taylor Swift is part of a Pentagon “psychological operation” to get President Joe Biden reelected, and somehow rig the Super Bowl to benefit Kansas City Chiefs tight end (and Swift’s boyfriend) Travis Kelce, has been met with forehead slaps in the national security world.

“The absurdity of it all boggles the mind,” said one senior administration official, granted anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly on the matter. “It feels like one of those ‘tell me you are a MAGA conspiracy theorist, without telling me you are a MAGA conspiracy theorist’ memes.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

MAGA world to Pentagon: la la la la la la la la la neener neener neeeeeener la la la la

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

I didn't realize how much Fox News was involved with this. I guess Fox is back in with the MAGA crowd?

What they're doing is very dangerous.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Uh... what? Fox News is the biggest right-wing propaganda platform in the world and it (still) exists to influence opinion. They've hosted him and his sycophants and election-denyers, etc multiple times. They might have briefly looked into how to insulate themselves after paying out almost a billion dollars for lies, but they're still all-in for Trump and the MAGA crowd, believe it...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 10 points 7 months ago

May I have your attention, please

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

I'm sure that'll put it all to rest

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Sadly they'll take the "Suspiciously specific denial" (How they'd see it) as confrimation

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

"tight end"? No way thats a fucking position!?

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait until you hear that there's also a "wide receiver".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

yeah they should have proper sports names like googley, Dibbly dobbly, slog sweep and jaffa

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

The Pentagon is right here.

[-] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Of all the violence, media manipulation, lies, a LITERAL coup attempt, and what the pentagon decides to crack down in is Fox slandering A FUCKING POP STAR?!

This world is insane, it has been for a while now.

edit: to stem the hate. I have nothing against Taylor Swift, good on her for telling people to vote. I don't get her music but then I'm not her target demographic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
639 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18883 readers
2515 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS