38
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's why I referred to vertical wind turbines, duh.

[-] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I got them mixed up. I meant to say VAWTS

[-] WenAmon@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd be very interested in a tiny turbine that gives off 500W per hour to cover the basic power consumption of the house when there is no sun shining. But most stuff I see is junk, and the other stuff is way too powerful for what I need.

[-] perestroika@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Good quality wind is high up.

Installing a turbine on a house is technically problematic (a mast is simpler to deal with), it is hard to maintain there and can convey noise into the house.

The advise about having a few acres of flat land as a minimum - it is sensible, unless other options beside wind cannot be chosen.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The other good option would be community ownership of a larger turbine. This would get you the lower cost per kwh and better availability that those have

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

2182 readers
39 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS