595
Price check (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 203 points 9 months ago
[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 61 points 9 months ago
[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 9 points 9 months ago

Best part, all content you watch is free of cost and tailored by your own brain cells.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago
[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

It's not stupid, it's advanced!

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 9 months ago

Doom doom doom

[-] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

I didn't realize those were swimming goggles at first, and was concerned about what he could possibly be doing that required safety goggles but no shirt.

[-] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

These glasses are very submerssive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago

From what I understand the thing isn't see through and the eyes are actually projected outside. Can somebody explain why they had to add tech to do it?

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 55 points 9 months ago

Because there are screens in the way? The choice was to either not have the viewer's eyes be visible, or use a screen to display eyes (not even real eyes, you can supposedly have cat eyes for an example). Considering the device is meant to be AR (augmented reality) and not VR, it kinda makes sense to show the user's eyes since they're still "connected" to the outside world. Otherwise you'd have a bunch of blank visors walking around and then people can't tell if you're looking at them or your furry waifu.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

You know how Microsoft solved this problem?

With glass.

[-] ColdFenix@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

And it sucked, fov of the augmented area was tiny, the projected images were see-through and you still couldn't really see the persons eyes because of the tinted glass. Vr headsets with cameras are currently by far the best way to do AR.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] qisope@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

You actually remove your eyes before inserting the optical couplers into your sockets. You put your eyes in the storage compartment on the front giving the appearance that you're looking out through the device.

[-] Aatube@kbin.social 35 points 9 months ago

Achieving realistic, fast camera passthrough on both sides is harder than you think

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Yes, that's my point. Why? Why make it extra more complicated and more expensive for no good benefit?

[-] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Heavier, too. It's about as heavy as the competitors despite having a separate battery.

It's not necessary to have the external screen.

The Quest has passthrough cameras to allow you to see the world with stuff displayed over it too, but Apple has decided that simulating eye contact is important.

It's Apple's unique selling point here, but they'd have what sounds like a high-quality headset without it.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

To allow eye contact for social interactions. If you want ubiquitous AR in real life that is what you need. This is an attempt to achieve this with current technology and it "almost" works / near miss / fails spectacularly.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That's why we've been stuck with windows for centuries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 26 points 9 months ago

Maybe they think it makes you look less stupid.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

They have Tesla truck success in that, then.

[-] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago

I think this is kind of a temporary workaround. In Apples ideal world, the Vision Pro would actually be transparent and you could see the users eyes for real, but the tech isn't ready to project what apple is doing on glasses. So they settled for a VR headset and put eyes on the outside. Eventually in however many years it takes, they will actually use glasses and won't have to do the screen on the outside. They must believe, that being able to see Vision Pro users eyes is integral to the product, or at least important to the product being accepted by everyone.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

What do you mean? They added the outside screen to a vr headset to try to make it more acceptable to wear around others.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 6 points 9 months ago

Imagine you're sitting in restaurant waiting for the waiter while doing some work on your Vision Pro. The waiter shows up and says 'sir...'. You look at him and... there were two options:

  • it's just a black screen so it's not clear if you're actually looking at him. Are you paying attention? Of are you still 'inside' and can't hear/see anyone

  • you have this fake eyes indicating that you're actually looking at him

It's a really stupid "solution" to a huge problem all VR/AR has The actual solution? Don't buy it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

Omg i hope that thing on the right is fan made

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago

Holy fuck you can't talk about a person like that

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

For 350 bucks it's a bargain though

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I mean, yeah, I already have my bid in but still.

[-] balancedchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

I'm gonna snipe that auction you're gonna be so mad

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] balancedchaos@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I have added 2 pennies for the lip.

[-] balancedchaos@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I'm sorry. :( lol

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

They made a VR headset... and put a holographic lightfield display... on the outside.

Real fucking brain trust over at Cupertino.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago

The one on the left holds up rich assholes who (sadly) have either all the impact on the world, or none of it

The one on the right holds up furries and femboys, who have all the impact on the IT and telecom infrastructure in the western world, which hold up everyone.

I respect the one on the right for obvious reasons.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Does that include the HRT?

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

You're gonna look like a CRT instead

[-] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago

Tell me you're into drone kink without telling me you're into drone kink. 😆

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Resol@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

At least the cheaper one protects me from the smell of nuclear was- I mean the smell of cigarettes.

[-] Surp@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Apple people sure do enjoy being cucked

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Btw, what happpened with the micro-mirrors and laser solution, projecting the image in your eyes? Sounds ideal for AR to me.

Not related to Apple.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

Expensive and difficult to get high resolution (good quality precise microscopic mirrors). Apple went for higher DPI regular display because that's a far more well known engineering problem

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
595 points (97.3% liked)

Memes

45602 readers
1255 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS