17
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 months ago

We've slowly come full circle, back to the age of cable TV.

[-] Lwaxana@startrek.website 5 points 9 months ago

Instead of paying for a bunch of channels we don't need we're paying for a bunch of shows we'll never watch.

TV shows should be released via RSS and a subscription is per-show for like $2 month. Then everyone can just have a single app with just the shows they want.

[-] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

2015 - 2018 was glorious. Netflix, Hulu, and HBO GO covered about 95% of my needs. Barely pirated anything.

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

so CBS and NBC when their powers combine for ultimate shittyness

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Paramount is desperate to enshittify.

[-] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

SkyShowtime seems to be a pilot version of this in Eastern Europe and the Netherlands. Not that it seems to be doing all that well. However, I’m not sure what Peacock offers that’s original content so it’s questionable what a bundle would add.

In any event, this seems a daft thing to do when they’re trying to sell the firm. One of the biggest problems Paramount+ has had is that it doesn’t stick with a strategy and has been so tangled up in previous licensing or partnership deals that it can’t pursue its plans in any reasonable or systematic way. Tying the hands of a new owner with a poison pill deal with Comcast doesn’t seem to benefit anyone.

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

I suppose it could make sense if they're looking to break up the company and keep the streamer.

It does seem like bundling might be the new strategy for the non-Netflix, non-Disney players.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Paramount and Comcast want more people pirating shows

[-] autotldr 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Both Paramount Plus and Peacock have been working hard to court subscribers in order to further solidify their respective statuses as lasting players in the streaming space, but according to a new report, the platforms’ parent companies could be considering a unique partnership.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Comcast and Paramount have been in recent talks about a potential streaming partnership that could see Paramount Plus and Peacock being offered to subscribers together as a package deal.

Along with making access to the two platforms comparatively cheaper than buying separate subscriptions, the partnership would help Comcast and Paramount “produce significant cost savings — from spending on programming to marketing.”

Word of these recent talks comes in the wake of Disney / ESPN, Fox, and Warner Bros. announcing last week that they’re working together to create a new shared service focused on sports — a sign that more studios and networks are beginning to get very serious about collaborating to survive the streaming wars.


The original article contains 164 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yet another service that I will never pay for. I'll just keep sailing thank you very much.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

As if Paramount+ wasn't shitty enough.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
17 points (90.5% liked)

Quark's

1097 readers
23 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS