97
submitted 9 months ago by juergen@feddit.de to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] juergen@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

They should have included his to pronounce antifa since everyone in America says it wrong. It is anti fascist, not an Tifa, which makes no sense

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

The Problem(tm) with "antifa",

is exactly what someone pointed-out years ago, possibly in a movie on some immense protesting done in the US...

( update: I think it was in this thing:

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0850253/?ref_=nm_flmg_c_55_act

: )

You have both the violent nihilists claiming to be "antifa" AND you have concerted-communitarians claiming it, and you have many others, between,

but the mainstream pseudojournalism media only boosts the violent nihilists' claim, hiding that there are contradictory claims on the symbol/label,

exactly the same as it pushes that islamism is what "islam" means, the same as what other regions' mainstream media does with "christian", or "jew", etc.

exactly the same as throughout the West, "swastika" means nazis, even-though that word, "swastika", IS SANSKRIT, & it was owned by Hindus, Hopis, Jains, Navahos, & Buddhists, for millenia, .. all that "doesn't count" in the eyes of the West, only the nazis have "valid" owning of the symbol??

( I'm a Buddhist skinhead, not a nazi skinhead, and always being accused of being nazi in the 1990's was insulting: Buddhist skinheads had existed for more than 2 millenia, but "don't have any validity" in White eyes. )

--

TragiComically, you can find, right in the Christian bible, where it differentiates between false-jews & real Jews:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+2%3A9&version=AMPC

.. but, of course, neither mainstream media, nor the Catholic Church, in its murdering of millions of Jews through the last couple of millenia ( the inquisition holocausted women 1st, Jews 2nd, e.g. and the crusades did alot of evil, including cannibalism, when they were starving while invading, too ) have held that passage to be central to understanding Truth's perspective, or the gospel of John, for that matter..

( John's attacking was of the "jews", the false-jews: that is made obvious by his using the term "rabbi" on Yehoshua "Jesus" benJoseph, which doesn't just mean "teacher", it means "Jew's Jew & Teacher".

John didn't have the device of falsifying-quotes, like we, in English, have, nowadays, and many were murdered as a result of the systematic-nonunderstanding that that accommodated. )


No matter: The Great Filter can't care what pretence we comfort ours beloved unconscious-ignorances with, can it?

It's just a force-of-nature, cornering unconscious-mind-toddlers-with-planet-massacring-technology into exterminating our own kind, faction-on-faction, in an ever-escalating funeral conflagration, right?

Such a needless planet-waste.

Objectivity, however, seems to be too-much-to-ask, of our kind.

_ /\ _

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

While Nazis don't own the swastika, they are so closely associated that you're going to make folks upset by flying it and you're going to make Nazis feel like they are welcome, and the unspoken intent unfortunately doesn't matter because when it comes to fascists you can't afford to give the benefit of doubt, nor can you afford to embolden them by making them feel welcome.

That's not right or fair, but it's the way things are. Just like there might indeed be some folks for whom the Confederate flag is associated with their family heritage, but 99% it just identifies racist assholes and attracts the same and makes them feel safe in opening their mouths.

I grew up a huge fan of Dukes of Hazzard and the General Lee, but now I see nothing but hatred when I see that flag. And if I saw a skinhead with a swastika, I'd get the fuck out of Dodge ASAP.

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
97 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS