406

Republicans Rush to Scrub Mention of FBI Informant in Impeachment Letter (newrepublic.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

House Republicans are quietly trying to remove traces of indicted ex–FBI informant Alexander Smirnov in their Biden impeachment quest.

House Republicans quietly deleted a reference to their epic fail of an FBI informant in a letter to a potential witness in the somehow-still-ongoing impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.

Republicans have hinged their Biden investigation on accusations from a supposedly credible but confidential FBI source that Biden and his son Hunter accepted bribes from a Ukrainian oligarch. But the Justice Department has since charged that source, former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, with making false statements and revealed his accusation may have been Russian disinformation.

As a result, House Republicans have begun to scrub mentions of Smirnov from their imploding investigation. Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and Oversight Chair James Comer, who have spearheaded the probe, sent a letter Tuesday to former State Department official Amos Hochstein requesting an interview. The GOP has accused Hochstein of advising Hunter Biden when the latter served on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago

Fuckin Russian cucks. The whole GOP.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

"We now have zero pieces of evidence to justify impeachment. Therefore, we must impeach."

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

"How else are we going to convince people impeachment is just a meaningless political cudgel to lower the impact of cheeto's treason if we don't intentionally turn the impeachment process into a meaningless political cudgel?"

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a result, Russian plants in the House of Representatives have begun to scrub mentions of Smirnov from their imploding investigation

fixed

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Russian operatives really

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Thanks, it was early. I thought about spies, but that didn't feel quite right.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Cue the circus music...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I believe you mean...

(Bet you people thought I forgot.)

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You should see if the LW admins will just add that as a custom emoji for you. lol. It's gotten some well earned mileage.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

We're a three-person family on a single income (not mine), but if they did that, I'd sell some plasma or something and give the money to the instance.

[-] ExceedinglyPanWoofer@yiffit.net 19 points 8 months ago

I still can't believe the major informant that they relied on, that turned out to be a Russian agent, was literally named "Alexander Smirnov"

[-] dasgoat@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I vodkan't believe it's Smirnov

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 3 points 8 months ago

The Republicans got Smirnov Iced

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Keep hiding your crimes, you fucking scum...while you think you can.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

Jim Jordan is such a treasonous twat.

How long until the DOJ charges this flaccid twat waffle?

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

Oops 🫢

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 6 points 8 months ago

Epic fail 👁️👁️

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Fuck these two morons.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024

406 points (99.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers

3069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News