62
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 14 points 8 months ago

I'm afraid it is genocide Jill, and your husband throwing in a few snacks after 6 months of throwing in bunker busters via the Israeli army isn't going to change that.

[-] But_Class_War@midwest.social 9 points 8 months ago

The president has been dogged by pro-Palestinian protesters at his public events for months, with his team now taking steps to shield him from the public shaming over his handling of the Israel-Hamas war. Biden has had to switch to smaller events, the locations of which are kept hushed until the last possible moment to evade protesters

Love to see the direct addition but JFC Biden will do anything to avoid ending aid to genocide and anything to avoid representing voters' stances. "Oh while trying to secure the election I'll just have smaller unannounced rallies instead of pulling my head out of my ass"

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago

If he doesn't see them they aren't real and the problem is solved. He's surrounded by senior advisors and what not that think this will just go away. It's maddening that they not only support the genocide but seem to be surprised that anyone would criticize them for it.

The depth of Democratic Party anger over President Joe Biden’s handling of the Gaza war has caught his campaign off guard and could depress support in November’s election, according to Reuters interviews with more than a dozen senior party and campaign officials and five dozen voters and activists.

The White House had expected Democratic unrest over Gaza to fade as Biden picked up his campaigning against presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, the officials said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/inside-democratic-rebellion-against-biden-over-gaza-war-2024-02-27/

[-] autotldr 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


TUCSON, Ariz.  — First lady Jill Biden spoke for only 14 minutes on the second leg of her “Women for Biden-Harris” tour — but that didn't stop pro-Palestinian protesters from interrupting her remarks four separate times.

“It’s a genocide, Jill!” yelled one of the four demonstrators in Tucson on Saturday morning as he was being forcibly escorted out of the venue by security.

The main focus of the first lady’s remarks was supposed to be on women’s issues, including abortion rights, which could be on the ballot in Arizona come November.

“Extremist Republicans led by Donald Trump are passing laws that prevent women from getting the health care they need, including IVF,” said Biden.

And polling shows young voters are particularly discontented with the way her husband, President Joe Biden, has handled the war.

The White House has announced the upcoming states where the first lady's Women for Biden-Harris tour will be going, but it hasn't yet publicly disclosed specific locations.


The original article contains 444 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago

It's sad that the pro Palestine left doesn't understand what genocide is, seems like they're on a mission to make the term meaningless, making its misuse their call to action.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

according to Article 2 of the UN's Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

how the actual fuck, after all these months, can anyone say that is not what is happening??

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago

Hamas is not a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, and that is who Israel says they intend to destroy.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

this is just asinine, the genocide is blatantly and obviously against the Palestinian people
also, you don't need to upvote your own comments, other people will do that if you say something worth reading

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social -1 points 8 months ago

No it obviously isn't. The deaths of Palestinian civilians are collateral damage, while Israel's tolerance for collateral damage has gone up the intent is not to destroy them. They have been very clear about intent: to destroy Hamas and get the hostages back, to achieve meaningful safety for Israel. If Hamas surrendered the war would end, because that is who this war is on.

If they wanted to destroy Palestinian civilians I suspect they could make all of Gaza into a crater in an afternoon. Why don't they? Because Israel is not genocidal, no matter how often you repeat the mantra.

I'll upvote what I please.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

just standing on a mountain of dead and starving children and babies..

This is fine because they said they're aiming for Hamas!

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

It’s a shame you don’t know what genocide is. Maybe we could do more to prevent it if people weren’t deliberately ignoring it.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social -2 points 8 months ago

I do know what genocide is, and this isn't it. See the other comment in this thread.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
62 points (77.2% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2632 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS