578
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 146 points 8 months ago

They complain about political correctness, and they go and do shit like this.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Political correctness: I can't say what I want!

Conservatives Later: it's now illegal for you to say what you want

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

As is fascist tradition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] art@lemmy.world 106 points 8 months ago

This is a blatant first amendment violation. Another pro-gamer move from the free speech party.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 106 points 8 months ago

There is no "good conservative" alive today.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

When the flip flopper in chief, Mitt Romney, is your only hope, or anyone named Cheney, we've got massive problems.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 32 points 8 months ago

Not that I disagree with you.

But even as a staunch Euro leftist, I think it is okay that there are people I strongly disagree with, even strongly dislike because I think the fight for values that are against my personal morality.

Both Romney and Cheney are such people.
I don't think they should have political power over other people.

But they share at least a certain common ground with me that the fascists don't.
And for how little I actually like those people, I still value this very difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Maybe some of them need to be less alive

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 92 points 8 months ago

I really can't comprehend the level of hate that these motherfuckers must possess to write or support such a bill. I mean, let's say you're an incredible asshole who doesn't think that trans people exist, like you think that you know who they are much better than they actually know themselves. Even with that as a baseline, isn't it still just the polite thing to treat them with basic respect?

If I found out that someone I just met preferred to use their middle name instead of their first name, I would 100% use that person's middle name when addressing them. It's just common courtesy. The same thing goes with a person who's transitioning - I will use their preferred name, because I'm not a completely deplorable piece of shit.

But this guy is way worse than someone who intentionally antagonizes people by using their disliked name when addressing them. This guy wants to actively punish anybody who has the rock bottom bare minimum of civility by destroying their lives and livelihoods.

I just can't grasp that level of hatred. How is it that this piece of shit shares enough genes with everybody else that he's recognized as human?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 81 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ah yes, further diluting the term sex offender down to the point the label is meaningless.

Makes perfect sense to combine teachers who accept pronouns, with people caught publicly urinating on the same list with violent rapists and convicted pedophiles.. after all, it's all the same.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago

The right is full of pedophiles and rapists so this works for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago

My honest reaction to news coming from USA these days:

[-] Pwnmode@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Ditto. But I'm in the USA myself.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It's difficult to differentiate between real news and The Onion now days. It's like... Comical but also terrifying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago

Jesus Christ fuck these GOP assholes so hard

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

HAIRCUTS! HAIRCUTS OF THE WRONG GENDER ARE PART OF THIS BILL!!

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Dafuq kinda haircut is gendered?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Any haircut underneath which stands someone Republicans want to oppress.

Just ask Darryl George.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

kim jong-un approves this law

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 42 points 8 months ago

As a practical result this is more of an attack on education than an attack on LGBT, who would want to be a teacher under such tyrannical rules?

[-] StevenSaus@midwest.social 19 points 8 months ago

They're getting two birds with one stone.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 40 points 8 months ago

How is anyone supposed to know anyone else’s pronouns without asking them?

Are the teachers supposed to check the genitals of their students at the beginning of the year?

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago

I feel like that’s what the right wants. They’re weirdly interested in that

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Naked lessons.. naked schools.. that way the sneaky trans kids also cannot change during the year.

[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

But if everyone is naked, the poor boys will be distracted. I mean, they already veer off course when shoulders are out. I guess the only appropriate solution is to not have the girls at (naked) school. /s

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Oh excellent point. All naked boys only and girls only schools. That will definitely resolve the issue and has no chance to backfire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

study to be a teacher in Missouri
teach full time for $30,000/year or something
become a sex offender, obviously can't teach anymore
can't actually find a job at all
forced to live in a designated trailer park for pedophiles
become a lifelong welfare recipient

nice one, conservatives

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

Don't like your teacher? Just flip your pronouns real quick and get them on the sex offender list. Problem solved.

Fuck this bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

This is how it starts, people.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago
[-] mob@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

Dumbass bills are introduced all the time. The news likes to bring them up but never talks about most of them being shot down though.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago

I vote we make all politicians sex offenders to see how they like it.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Most of them already are... but I get your point.

[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

I hate that these are usually rage bait titles, but this is legitimately terrifying

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Okay. Everyone is a they/them. No binary gender for anyone. Hedge your bets and play it right down the middle.

Problem solved

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 months ago
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Fuck Missouri Republicans.

[-] TooSoon@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] don@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

Missouri deliberately impoverishing themselves is par for the conservative course.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Two years ago I would have said no worries, there's no way a bill like this can pass. Now? Let's just say I don't take anything for granted.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 8 points 8 months ago

Just give politicians prison time for wasteful laws like this. It's objectively a waste of taxpayer's dollars used to fuel hate crimes. Fuck them, they should get 100x the risk and accountability then the poor paycheck to paycheck teachers they keep overly focusing on.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

For anyone curious and who wants the sauce, here is the link to the actual proposed changes. It is pretty transparent and accessible.

https://documents.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills241/hlrbillspdf/5874H.01I.pdf

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
578 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS