this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
357 points (95.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

33896 readers
1027 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't take this satirical thought seriously, just take it for what it is, total nonsense.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally, I think every woman should go to jail for keeping her eggs in her ovaries. That’s child imprisonment.

How dare they.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Every egg shed is another egg dead. We need to outlaw tampons and start using corks instead.

Again, don't take my satire seriously, the whole situation is absurd.

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every woman should empty her menstrual cup into a test tube and mail it in.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You say it as a joke but what if people started mailing their menstrual blood to the houses of the shitlords passing these laws

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They can email it in these days right?

[–] NoRodent@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Christ, he must be FUMING

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Alabama ruling was specifically for one case. However, they made a very general ruling which could be used to argue all kinds of things that make no sense. The court even acknowledged this but said something along the lines of "it is not this courts duty to determine other cases". Essentially "The clinic is being sued for wrongful death of a child and they argued this law doesnt apply to frozen embryos. We have decided it does and the case can move forward. We acknowledge this sets a terrible precedent but we don't care. Also here are some Bible quotes because the Supreme Court of Alabama uses the Bible for legal arguments and somehow this isn't religious law"

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm still trying to process your words.

Don't get me wrong, all your words make sense grammaticaly, but the state of the world makes absolutely no sense.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's any slight consolation whatsoever, the Bible quotes being used as evidence was just from the concurring opinion (that came to the same conclusions for other reasons from the majority), written by the chief justice of that court.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alright, gotcha. They also didn't have freezers when the Bible was written. So, care to re-evaluate your comment?

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, I don't begin to understand it, and it terrifies me. But at least it's far away from me for now.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still gave you my upvote anyways. Even if our opinions differ, or maybe it's just that confusing or controversial subject, I thank you for taking time to read my post and comment. 👍

[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That poster is agreeing with you that the court's decision was bad and dumb.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you think the recent decision was very based, I don't think our opinions are all that different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

It doesn't make much sense.

When a high court makes a decision, all the lower courts need to follow it. If a high court says anyone on trial for murder must be tried as an adult, then all the lower courts need to follow that rule. It is incredibly rare for a high court to make such a broad rule though. Usually their rulings are much more precise. Like: on trial for murder, over the age of 15 and shows at least 4 of the following 12 signs of maturity: has a job, has a driver's licence, etc...

This was a case where their ruling was incredibly broad and had no conditions. They literally said "we are adding 'frozen embryo' to the legal definition of 'child'" and just left it at that. This means all courts in Alabama must consider frozen embryos to be children when ruling on cases, which of course has a lot of practical problems.

Already people have pointed out that in vitro fertilization has effectively been banned. All IVF clinics in Alabama are currently closed. Republican law makers cheered this until it was pointed out that IVF clinics create babies. They aren't abortion clinics. Now they're scrambling to re-legalize IVF in Alabama. So yeah, all the old men in Alabama have zero clue about what they're doing. They just like ensuring everything is considered a child because that's what Jesus wants.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's always been okay. Conservatives don't give a shit about child safety.

Freeze 'em, starve 'em, shoot 'em... as long as there's human suffering to be had!

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Freeze 'em, starve 'em, shoot 'em...

But for the love of God, do not under any circumstances educate them!

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not even a religious person, but you preach the truth!

[–] PurpleSheeple@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Strange fellas, those Conservatives. When I was young, I thought getting education was at least as bad as being starved, frozen or shot. So why is it singled out?

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Don't forget their continued legal right to marry them off to 50 year old men.

[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It also means that abortion in Alabama is now legal as long as you freeze the results.

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Holy fuck?!?! I can't find any fault in that logic.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep mine next to the ice cream

[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just don’t accidentally grab the wrong container or it will be murder and cannibalism! Shades of Kronos.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Accidentally?

[–] person@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That's called Benadryl.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck yeah, I'd be down for a QuietAfternoon2000. Hell, do they make one for adults? I'm ready for a good nap.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ooh, sorry, you've already purchased the "Over-30-Everything-Hurty" DLC for Living: Life and we don't offer refunds, so....

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we don't offer refunds

That's ok, I'll cut my losses. Just take it back.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hello!

Thank you for your interest in returning your Life: Living DLC "Over-30-Everything-Hurty". As part of our efforts to allow you to enjoy the current season Capitalism: If You Don't Own Everything You Own Nothing as quickly as possible all DLC was registered to your account by $Mother on $Birthday. Unfortunately, once tied to your account any registered DLCs can not be removed.

We hope you have a pleasant day!

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The package is no longer sealed, we can't accept returns.

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not acceptable to freeze children? Brb...

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make sure to thaw them slowly

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank fuck you're here, was going to use defrost on the microwave.

[–] dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well microwave was made to defrost frozen Hamster 🐹 to life. You are not too far of the track. If you want to know more there is a Tom Scott video on it.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Microwave was actually invented from repurposed radar station parts, but I'm enjoying the comment thread, so carry on..

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I saw that! Amazing stuff.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No no, eggs tend to explode in the microwave

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 21 points 1 year ago

If you could freeze people, and, this is important, and unfreeze them without any repercussions or harm. Then it would be totally normal to do. Oh I'm going on a trip I'm getting frozen they will thaw me out on the other side.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Courts deciding on nature of reality is peak Kafka.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not a new story though. A family member argued about a traffic accident, that the description provided by the other side is physically impossible. The judge replied, that physics would not count for humans.

A lot of people who study law do so, because they are terrible at sciences.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kafka is also not a new author.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And yet courts making stupid rulings surely predates him? (Even if that example does not)

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but he was the best to describe the absurdity.

load more comments
view more: next ›