submitted 8 months ago by LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to c/treehuggers@slrpnk.net

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

City trees are much more expensive than rural trees to maintain. Orders of magnitude more so.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago

Well rural trees are typically extremely low cost to maintain. I’m not sure I understand the relevance of this comment.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Then they should plant rural trees

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024

29 points (96.8% liked)

Tree Huggers

598 readers

1 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS