this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
756 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68441 readers
3091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article: "Unsurprisingly, this skyrocketed searches for the best VPNs. According to a SlashGear report sent to Mashable, searches for "Texas VPN" jumped by 1,750 percent in the past day. It also spotted a 1,600 percent increase for the phrase "How to access Pornhub.""

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if it was just lobbying from the VPN industry this whole time?

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably the politicians bought VPN stock just before this was ruled. Just like so many "randomly" happened to buy video conference stock just before the COVID lockdown?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I mean if you saw what was going on in Italy and had any clue about it, you'd have been smart and purchased it. There was a lockdown in Italy for like he saw it month before there was even talk of COVID coming to the states

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pop@lemmy.ml 106 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Lots of shady free VPNs out there from Chinese/Russian companies. Now instead of just letting people watch porn, they'll send their data to a shady/foreign entity. The apps will ask all the permissions, and people who don't know shit, will grant them.

Same thing will happen when they ban Tiktok.

Well done, You played yourself.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 35 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Definitely no shady VPNs run by white westerners though. Theyve all got impeccable morals through ans through. Glad you cleared that up.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 13 points 1 year ago

Reread the comment considering it's taking the view point of a Republican in Texas who voted this law, it will make more sense.

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let me make it clear folks, nobody has better morals than white people, believe me. They're tremendous, the best. They follow the rules, they respect authority, they're just fantastic. I mean, look at me, I'm the best example of great morals, and I'm white, folks. White people, they're winners, they know how to do things right, they're tremendous patriots. So let's make America great again with the incredible morals of white people leading the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

I dont think so, Texas finally solved the problem with porn, now nobody can watch it and everyones life (and children) are finally safe.

/s

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just use proton VPN, the free tier should be enough.

[–] DudeDudenson 26 points 1 year ago

His argument is that the average person won't know any better and will just take the first sponsored result for "free VPN" of Google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure the people who legislated all this into place were the first ones to access a VPN to get onto PornHub

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suspect they invested in companies that sell VPNs.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Kape technologies comes to mind, which owns Private Internet Access, CyberGhost, and ExpressVPN, and is in turn owned by an Israeli billionaire

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_Sagi

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Is there a wesbite that hosts all these connections? I'm sure if we could see the web of relations there'd be a little but of reasoning on top of this dung pile.

[–] hempster@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Using a VPN that is beholden to shareholder's mood swings let alone a publicly tradable company is dangerous

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago (6 children)

At some point, Republicans will surely cross the line where their policies are so unpopular that people stop voting for them, right?

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They are heavily entrenched in Texas. They will have to badly piss off most people enough that they all go vote in the same cycle.

Our state government has actually been getting much more radical over the past few years, because the only people who vote are conservative radicals, because everyone else is either apathetic or aware that their vote won't matter unless millions of people suddenly wake up tomorrow and vote.

[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Millions of people not voting because it would take millions of people voting to elicit positive change and nobody is doing that is one of the most frustrating things.

[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I refuse to be part of that group. I'm a democrat living in KS and I vote in every single election I can. My candidate may not win, but damnit they will count my vote and know that I dissent.

[–] Bear_pile@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I look at it as earning my right to bitch about our elected officials

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not as long as the other guy is some dirty liberal who believes in socialist conspiracies like the holocaust having actually happened....

(Yes this is sarcasm, not actually saying the holocaust didn't happen)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've never really understood why they claim it didn't happen, it's not like they were the ones doing it so I don't understand why they feel the need to protect themselves by claiming its non-existence.

Meanwhile the actual people who did do it fully acknowledge that it happened, was bad, and have taken steps to ensure it never can be allowed to happen again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately that isn't how identity politics works.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Not as long as there are minorities to blame for everything.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something something… Leopards ... Face eating …

I doubt it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 48 points 1 year ago

I should register bringbacktheporn.tx.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

To be fair current age verification is useless. We all know clicking a button does not verify anything.

Also we know that submitting personal data to a website to verify your age is terrible. Big no no.

I'm curious of what will happen in my country. Here in Spain government said that they will implement a new age verification system using Anonymous digital certificates. The government will issue those and you have to give your ID but the certificate itself it's anonymous and the website won't be able to know who is the person behind the certificate. While there's no implementation yet, I hope they use the kind of anonymous certificates that, once expedited, the government also does not know who is using the certificate when serving as a certificate authority to validate its authenticity.

Let's see how it goes. I'm afraid even while being privacy friendly with this system Pornhub will block access here to as a threat to other places. At the end is a private company and blocking minors from accessing their content cost them big money, and, of course, money is the only thing that matters to them.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To be fair, who gives a shit about age verification?

I do not care what your child does on the Internet.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Right. Why do I have to submit a retinal scan and 3 forms of ID to watch porn because parents can't be bothered to learn basic computer skills and monitor their own children?

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The right way to implement this is where they don't even have any persistent identifier that could be used for tracking. They should only ever see a derived single-use signature that after verification gives them a yes/no answer and nothing more.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It IS possible from a technical standpoint to be able to do anonymous age verification. I can think of several methods that would work but the issue is I’d have to trust a company or the government with this information and trust them to not do something stupid with it like using it for nefarious purposes, selling it, or just not protecting it well enough. And with all the data brokerages and security breaches in the news there is no way I’d ever do that. Just not gonna happen. This data is just too valuable to trust any single company with it.

To me this is absolutely a 1st and 4th amendment issue. We are quickly devolving in an American religious state ruled by morality police.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 44 points 1 year ago (8 children)

There's a certain argument that it might be preferable from a privacy standpoint if people used VPNs in general, though it sure isn't ideal from a performance standpoint.

[–] laxe@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It also costs money. For many people, every monthly fee makes a difference.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmylem@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Wireguard is super fast compared to OpenVPN

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 40 points 1 year ago

Go on, Texas, try to ban VPNs.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

POON. Muad’Deepthroat. Feyd-Rawdog. The story just lends itself to porn parody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

... Then they banned VPNs. Thanks to the Republicans we have scorched sky's... We don't know who stroke first, but without Internet we are now a real communicative country with people who..... Billy! Put your rocks down man! I'm trying to tell you s story about how important Republicans are to us and yet you choose to distract the entire class with your rock tossing game!

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only thing that matters is texas loses

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blazera@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wonder how many people here never saw porn before they were 18.

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

When I was a teenager, we got our porn the old fashioned way, by shoplifting it from the magazine rack at the convenience store.

[–] silica@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

No, sir I’ve never heard of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just gonna leave this predictable comment right here: https://lemmy.world/comment/8449238

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

They "right porn" to keep it entirely out of the public eye so they can follow their illegal and inhumane sexual shit in private. You're searching for the real perverted bastards? The one's who's shouting against sexual freedom the loudest. Search their computers.

load more comments
view more: next ›