I know I am way out there. But is it possible that actual human interaction could have a positive effect on loneliness?
Agreed, but sometimes it's difficult for people to get that human interaction, for a variety of reasons.
I'm not sure the answer is robots, though...
I think humans are too specifically hardwired for actual human interaction for it to work. Like, it's so specific that even online communication with real humans doesn't fill the void. I can talk to friends on Discord for ages, but it's not the same as meeting up and going to do something.
I really don't think an AI, even a convincing one, is going to make a large dent on loneliness in the majority of cases.
I think it depends on the humans. Personally, I find online interactions more comfortable than in-person ones, most of the time. In-person interactions exhaust me, if they aren't with the small handful of people with whom I'm most comfortable, so I can really only take them in short doses. I can chat online without any such issues, so if I were lonely, a companion A.I. that could carry on actual conversations might really help, even if it isn't a 1:1 replacement for human interaction.
I'm aware that I am probably not representative of the majority of people, but I doubt I'm the only one who feels the way I do, so there could be a place for this sort of thing, where it could do some actual good.
Someone's already killed themself after encouragement from an ai. I don't think trusting ai with unrestricted and unsupervised access to vulnerable people is a good idea.
The phrasing of the article makes it sound like robots will be replacements for human companionship, which is probably nonsense in any near term like the ten year period quoted, but it could maybe get to the point of imitating a companion animal like a dog or a cat to alleviate abject loneliness and pester people to move around their house. (The Aibo dream can finally be realized in my lifetime!)
Maybe a robot conversation could fool an older person with dementia or something, but I would definitely worry about leaving anyone detached enough to be fooled into thinking a language model is a conversation unattended with one. And if you're not fooled then it's just a spiral.
There's just so much wrong with this article. The whole website seems to be geared towards people who celebrate tech without understanding any if it. I.e.: tech bros.
Which is why I'd expect to see this article quoted on satire groups like: "did silicon valley reinvent the bus again?".
I've seen this movie before. Langella is so good in it.
Getting lied to by a three armed twelve fingered algorithm.. Hmm...
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed