197
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The number of people who describe themselves as Republican has slightly declined since the last presidential election.

The polling firm Gallup, which tracks party affiliation monthly, says that those identifying as Republicans has shrunk by two percentage points since 2020. In February 2020, 30 percent of those Gallup polled said they were Republicans, while 29 percent considered themselves Democrats.

As of February 2024, when the latest data is available, 28 percent say they are Republicans, while 30 percent say they are Democrats, showing Republican's base declining. Newsweek contacted the Republican National Committee (RNC) by email to comment on this story.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 117 points 8 months ago

Has it shriveled, or has it slightly declined? You can’t have both.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

Click it!! Click the link!

Click the - It will shock you!! The . . . article! You won’t believe the, uh, amount of . . Shrivelage! They found!! One weird!

Cliiiiick iiiiiiiiit!!!

. . . This comment brought to you by Desperate News Organizations. DNO promises a thrilling hell-ride into fascism, or, possibly not, but only if you visit our many, many sponsors. Now! Go! ClickTheFrickingLink!! Aaaaaaaaaaa

[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Is this a copypasta? Because it’s pretty good.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 16 points 8 months ago

I’m not even sure this qualifies as any kind of decline. Surely this is within the margin of error.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

It's evidence that progress really is marching forward one grave at a time.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

It really doesn't. I'm sure their error margins are larger than 1%. It could totally be the democratic party that has shrunk and the republican party has grown if the error is bad enough (which it almost certainly isn't, but I'm trying to make a point). I'm not clicking that article though. I'm not going to justify that headline.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago

The fact that the base has only "slightly declined" is incredibly bad news, considering that the Republicans' shift towards the deep end of fascism has been way more than "slight!"

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 38 points 8 months ago

Don't care.

Vote.

[-] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

There was a 2% decrease over 4 years. 30% to 28%. Hardly "shriveling."

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

And that 2% drop was probably people who will vote for Trump but didn't want the survey taker to know if

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Turns out conservatives love authoritarianism and just want to be ruled by a king.

Who would've thought the political ideology spawned to conserve the influence of landowners, aristocracy, and monarchy post democratic revolution would turn out to be such of bunch of auth dickholes?

[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

The 2% are the dead Republicans that refused to wear a mask to "own the libs"

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 8 months ago

Or just old bastards who have been voting for Reaganomics for forty years and can't figure out why the rich get richer and they can't afford healthcare.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Can we just lock journalists in cages until they memorize a gradeschool dictionary please?

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

maybe they were in the pool

[-] HogsTooth@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

You mean "died." All the COVID conspiracies were from the right and they didn't wear masks, sucked down horse dewormer, and travelled like they won the lottery. They asked for this, they DEMANDED this.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

FAFO is what comes to mind

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Gee, maybe convincing them vaccines are the devil had negative repercussions

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Great Deals on Used Harleys!

Act now and receive TWO free vintage wraparound sunglasses!

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago

It kinda looks like the elephant is wearing jeans.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Agreed, we need to be talking about this more.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Unironically worth much more of my attention than the article. I need more elephants in jeans. Are there equivalent donkeys in jeans? If not, let’s call out the rampant media bias and do something about it (specifically making more images of animals wearing jeans).

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

Let me just point out that as long as the Republican base remain highly-motivated voters, they will still continue to win and to dominate. If people that identified as Demoratic voters were 72%, and Republicans were 28%, it would be a tossup in US politics if they showed up to polls at 90%, and Dems at the more typical 35%. If you don't want Trump in office, and you want to actually see him end up in jail for the wide variety of federal and state crimes he's committed, get your ass out and vote for Biden--yes, yes, he's not even close to being my first choice either--and make sure everyone you know votes for Biden.

[-] philoneous@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

2% is margin of error territory

[-] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

What matters most is not what they publicly say, but how they privately vote.

So many people said Trump made them feel safe to show their true feelings. People are staying racist and fascist, just learning to keep it quiet again

[-] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

i dont think the landslides are uncommon.
the whole tiktok fiasco could trigger anger in genZ into becoming politically active.

could also somehow still fall into regressive republican hands too. imho

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
197 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS