I have a feeling my 16-year-old blind deaf Irish Terrier could outmaneuver the brain trust that is Lauren "Handjobber" Boebert.
Woah, woah, woah there buddy. It's not just a "handjob" to her, alright? It's a "hand-career".
Hope she's better at it than she was in the restaurant industry.
Clearly she must be, the alleged tug she gave ted Cruz got her into Congress. She has headshots and more on a website for escorts allegedly she was in DC escorting around the same time ted Cruz got busted using escorts and somehow, little miss "my ex husband flashes his penis at minors, that's what I love him" ended up as a congressperson
Woah woah! No shame on her for that! I fully support her transition to a post-political career in sex work!
Oh no, no hate here. It's smart thinking to have a secondary skill set.
Or in this case, a skillset.
It's not a job if you love what you do.
"You know, one day it would be nice if Ted Cruz gave me a handy for a change" - Lauren Boebert probably
A GOP "firebrand" is just another term for classless white trash.
I had to look that word up because I don't hear it very often. It's a really bad usage here. Firebrand implies someone who wants to change things and is passionate about a cause.
BOBO and the rest of the MAGA clan don't have a cause, they just want to incite chaos, be disruptive and petulant, and enable racists.
I almost didn't recognized her without her hooters hanging out of a cocktail dress.
Starting to think that "Boobs!" would be a better re-election strategy than whatever she's doing now.
Boobert/Exhibitionism 2024!
I can't wait until the day this dumb cunt is serving me my plant based burger at some dumpy fastfood joint.
Edit: no offense meant to fastfood workers.
Ohhh noooo… I’m soooo saaaad. Anyway what’s for dinner? 😌
Lauren Go-Gurt
I'm sure she'll blow her way through them.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
As well as further reducing US House speaker Mike Johnson’s already threadbare majority in his legislative chamber, last week’s abrupt departure of Colorado congressman Ken Buck has the potential to significantly damage another prominent Republican figure: Lauren Boebert.
The calculation was that it would offer safe harbor and a near-certain return to Congress later this year, while allowing her to complete her term in office in her current seat.
“It’s ridiculous,” he told the Colorado Sun, stressing his decision to leave the House – where Republicans for the moment had a 219-213 edge over Democrats – was solely over his disillusionment at a lack of action in Congress.
The congresswoman’s second term has been mired in controversy, including an unsavory groping incident involving a male companion at a Denver theater in September, and the arrest of her 18-year-old son in February on felony charges over multiple instances of credit card and identity theft.
Either way, Boebert faces a monumental challenge to extend her political career in a House in which her behavior has been questionable, including unseemly heckling of Joe Biden during his 2022 State of the Union speech.
In December, self-styled “no-nonsense conservative” Richard Holtorf, a candidate in the district four primary, said in a tweet that “seat shopping isn’t something that the voters look kindly on”.
The original article contains 768 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
And just like that her career dissipates like a cloud of vape smoke next to children.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News