I think this is correct, and kind of surprised they didn't reach this conclusion sooner. That being said, i think the DPRK has to make efforts to engage with the people of south korea by any means posible, the only way reunification is a possible future is if the people of south korea unite and reject US occupation in their soil.
I don't believe this is an entirely good idea.
This does not mean that they no longer pursuit reunification, it just means that they no longer will engage with the quisling state of south korea because they have correctly identified them as an enemy of reunification.
I agree that they are, but they should still keep the organization.
Could the Korean War resume in the near future?
GenZedong
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)