this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
83 points (97.7% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

1354 readers
36 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also being sued by the developers are the construction company, the home’s architect, the family who previously owned the property, and the county, which approved the permits.

I know, I'll sue my way out!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's kinda the american way...

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 1 points 1 year ago

(patent pending)

[–] GekkoState 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bulldoze it, it's her land right?.

It should be like having someone else's car towed off your driveway.

[–] TheUncannyObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The example you used is pretty flawed. You can tow a car without damaging it. You can’t bulldoze a house without damaging it. If she did that, it would be like destroying a car because it was parked on your property. That wouldn’t just open her up to civil liability, but also criminal liability. She may own the land, but the house is someone else’s property. She can’t damage it or she goes to jail.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I guess it's time to get a screw gun and crow bar

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh wow, that's a breathtaking level of incompetence.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an easy enough mistake to make, but it should've been caught at one of the various checks during the process. The fault is entirely on the one sueing everyone. If you point a finger, there's three fingers pointing back at you.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’d still like to know the root cause of the mistake. The article mentions the lots were identified by signs on utility poles. Did a surveyor mark them wrong? Did somebody maliciously change them?

I also wonder if it’s something that could have been spotted if somebody just asked a simple question and wasn’t ignored. For example, were the lots addressed 1, 2, 3, but then 5, 4, 6?

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, I see multiple contractors having some trouble with their licenses very soon.

So many people dropped the ball (or the developer did it intentionally, anymore I wonder).