Physical if it's for a collection. Digital if it's for regular reading.
I also prefer the library to buying books as much as possible.
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
Physical if it's for a collection. Digital if it's for regular reading.
I also prefer the library to buying books as much as possible.
Library ftw! Some of them will even buy books for you if they don't have them. I think my city will let one do 3 year.
When I buy books I buy physical, but sometimes digital is more practical, even with small format books I struggle to read them in public transit during my work commute, with a reader like Kindle or even with a smartphone I don't have to work about my book being damaged in a bag it someone, even without a cover a reader will say least scratch a bit, on the other hand dropping a reader is another story, the screen can easily break, book won't. Also the obvious thing is you can get ebooks instantly, physical ones have to be shipped or at least brought from the store like everything physical. Another thing is WAREZ, you can get ebooks illegally, I don't condone it but it makes the access easier, sometimes it's the only way to get a given book because it's sold out or something. But I'm one of those people who don't have a problem with ebooks, on an ebook reader I see them equal with paper ones
I'm old fashioned so all my books are physical for now. I used to hate on ereaders (first Kindle), but as I'm older, sight gets worse, readers get better (hopefully) and space is also an issue I'm already thinking of buying one. But which one? That is the question. I'd prefer something simple, without online nonsense, where I can put my files too (e.g. local library puts out PDFs of royalty-free classics for free).
I used to always do physical books, but I'm nearly 100% converted to ebooks for three reasons:
Physical, and I buy used as much as possible. For some reason I just retain the information better when I read it in a physical book.
Digital. I've run out of space for storing physical books.
Digital, unless I really want the book and it is only analog.
The analog form factor of books is IMHO much nicer, and I understand everyone who doesn't like digital books.
Stil, for me going digital beats analog:
I also have to say, Amazon really earned all the critic it gets, but their Kindle apps and physical devices are awesome. It is easy to buy DRM free books and read/sync them with Amazon kindle infrastructure (send to device etc.).
Physical for some comics, mostly digital because I get most of my books from the library. A lot of libraries around the US have fantastic support for digital media.
I love physical books, but ebooks are so convenient. Always having a book, being able to comfortably read one handed, and being able to read in the dark after my wife goes to sleep are all things that significantly increase how often I can read.
If I'm buying, it's physical. If I'm borrowing, it's digital.
The only thing I buy physical copies of are art books and bird ID books. My phone screen isnβt a good size for viewing detailed art, and even a large tablet isnβt ideal because of how colors can vary depending on screen settings.
Otherwise I usually donβt buy ebooks either, I check them out from my local library with Libby. I donβt typically do a lot of rereads, and when I do itβs easy to recheck them out.
I love a good personal library as a background for my video calls but honestly I do digital books cause I don't have room.
I like physical books as I find it more immersive compared to phones and such. When using a phone or computer it's much more tempting to open up social media or another app.
That's why I also like to draw/design on paper as well and use a dedicated music player.
Digital the first time, because highlighters and tabs are a poor substitute for a search feature.
Then, if I like it enough, physical for subsequent reads, with the digital copy as reference material when needed.
E-books. I read too many books for physical to be practical.
No, I download ebooks (except for The Knowledge, which is physical else it would be useless if I was in a situation to need it), as they have numerous benefits such as text searching, coming back to where I left off, customising how it looks, available anywhere and much lighter.
Like fifteen years ago I would buy physical books, I still have a huge collection. I was getting really into math and would buy textbooks. Sometimes they could be pricey, but for a good hardcover, it can really be worth it if you're coming back to it a lot.
Very early 2010s the amazon books became awful overnight. You could pay $70 for a hardcover and the damn thing would start falling apart a few days into reading it. I really don't think I'm hard on my books, I treat them with care. These things just couldn't handle normal wear for even a short amount of time. Paperbacks were even less reliable and only slightly less expensive. So I completely ditched amazon and started ordering books directly from the publishers. Normally they'd be like $10-15 more than on amazon, but it's worth it, they weren't falling apart.
Probably around 2012 I finished reading volume 2 of Francis Borceux's "Handbook of Categorical Algebra". Those first two volumes are genuinely some of the best math books I've ever gone through, it took me like a year each though. Volume 3 was very expensive to get from the publisher, I think it was over $160, but since I had gotten so much mileage out of the first two I decided I wanted to just pony up. It was clear as soon as it arrived that it was a piece of shit, and did start falling apart immediately. I left emails and phone calls and they just ghosted me and I couldn't figure out a way to get my money back. That was the last book I bought for like a full decade, and I don't think I've made a book purchase from anywhere over $15 since.
Pretty sure that was Cambridge University Press, and I had purchased something else (although much much cheaper) from them the year before that was good quality.
I still greatly prefer having a physical copy, but I pirate almost everything I can't find in a library now.
I buy physical and obtain a digital copy later to chuck on the kindle. I enjoy reading physical books but time and life make it harder, plus I like to buy collectors editions where possible, they are not for reading (to me)
Audio books are a lot easier for me to consume as I am visually impaired
Purely a space issue for me these days, but the more I use my Kindle, the more I like it. Being able to just highlight a word and get the definition has been a real game changer. Although, it's only because of e-ink displays that I even considered it in the first place. Definitely would not be reading books on a regular tablet/display.
Physical. I enjoy thrift shopping for books cheap - mostly unusual cooking books.
I do surveys for money and so I use Google Play gift cards to buy ebooks and they don't cost me actual income. Win win.
Physical because I write in my books, it keeps me more engaged in the reading process. I also like having them on my shelf and ready to share with a friend or colleague.
I love buying used books that someone has written in the margins. It's about the only reason I'll buy a physical book these days.
Digital. I use Kindle and just submit to Amazons monthly fees.
Full price books? Digital. Then second hand physical (rarely) and books from a library.
Audio book gang unite!
I normally pirate audio books and purchase them physically for our bookshelves around the house because I like the look and supporting the author but I like listening a lot more.
I pirate most of the books I read. I am not a millionaire and space on the bookshelf is limited. I only buy physical if I want to treat myself with special edition or a book not available digitally.
God bless Anna's archive!
Physical. And then, depending on what I feel like, maybe download a digital copy somewhere and read it on my ereader. Usually the case with big, phat books that I don't feel like holding for a longer time or lugging around with me.
No because the library exists for both.
Ebooks have their convenience, and once in a while I'll take a free one if offered, or pick them up cheap in a bundle.
But physical books capture my interest way better. More satisfying to hold and look at. Having a physical object around is a reminder to read. And paper books are better for tuning out distractions. If I try to read ebooks on a phone, tablet, or PC I can easily lose focus (though nice dumb-device readers are surely out there, I don't have one).
The eink readers are a night and day experience vs a normal screen, but if youβre not invested already it can be hard to consider buying one.
Almost entirely digital now. As for why:
I find I buy far more books now that I have an e-ink reader.