90
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I'll keep voting for whichever candidate has the best chance of beating the GOP provided that candidate isn't even worse than the GOP. Voting for an also-ran is a half-vote for the greater evil.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

bOtH sIdEs aRe tHe sAaAaAaAamE!!

...yeah I fell into that mental trap for a while too. And yeah, the two party system and FPTP leaves a lot to be desired.

But we gotta focus on the here and how, which is a party of obstructionists at best, and literal Nazis at worst; vs a party of science and rights at best, and kinda toothless / often uninspiring at worst. Voting for anything else, or choosing not to vote at all, is still accepting that one of the aforementioned two will win; you're just silencing your own voice and letting your countrymen decide on your behalf.

...and when enough people do the same, that's a great way to end up with fucking Nazis.

[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 23 points 1 year ago

I think this is pretty easy to say for people who don't need incrementalism. Like if your immediate goal is luxury space communism then of course the system itself is in your way, and everyone voting for anything not like luxury space communism is hindering you.

Those of us whose existences remain political, and who have a vocal and highly-organized set of political enemies, can't afford to vote the whole system into nonexistence. Because who knows where our rights and liberties will be afterwards? Or even if we fail with our moonshot and wind up with fascists -- that's equally as bad for us. Whereas the radical utopians seem to be more "meh, we'll just try again later. With less LGBTQ+ people I guess!"

Anyway, less evil is actually really important for a lot of people.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the good news is that we are taking the proper increments in the US.

  • Unions, which democratize workplaces and actually ease the burdens on the working class
  • Ranked Choice Voting, which has reached a few states, although it will take some time on a Federal level.
[-] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Beyond ranked choice, we really need proportional representation like so many of the more successful parliamentary governments

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, we need so many more reps. On every level it's kinda ridiculous, but I'm unaware of discussions about how to do it.

[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 7 points 1 year ago

And we are slowly but surely moving the needle on LGBTQ+ rights and women’s rights. I agree we’re making progress. I disagree that it’s because the parties are both the same actually.

[-] reverie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

A very roundabout way to say “both sides”

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

A very direct way of shutting any legitimate criticism.

If you can't acknowledge the flaws in the system, for fear of something worse happening, you've already failed. Cause those flaws are going to come back to bite you in the ass anyways.

[-] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Until we truly don't have a two party system, I'm tired of hearing this "both sides" bull. I'm going to choose the party that treats climate change as a real thing, and while progress is not as fast as I would like, they can be convinced to try harder while the other party doesn't even think it's real.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The biggest problem with the two party system is that there is only solution A or solution B. And very often, solution B is only NOT solution A.

In reality there are countless solutions and most of them are NEVER considered.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

I wanna know how many of the "both sides suck" people vote for other parties. There are other parties. But usually when I point this out, the response is "but they have no chance of winning!"

Maybe they would... If you voted for them instead of only looking at the big 2.

[-] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, your not wrong on paper but in reality the way or voting system/ electoral college works makes it so a third party winning pres is functionally impossible. Until we do something with the electoral college and switch to something like ranked choice, a third party vote is a ballot in the trash.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

While I totally get that, I do also feel if there ever was a time where the majority of voters didn't pick democrat or republican, shit would change pretty fucking quickly when it didn't change the outcome and people get, understandably, pissed. Playing into the system doesn't change it. Bending it and breaking it does.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The majority don't want to have to put in the energy to choose between more than the "good guys" and the "bad guys", though. So wishing for a change accomplishes nothing.

[-] greavous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I usually find they don't vote at all or make like libertarians and succumb to the right on polling day.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
90 points (81.2% liked)

Political Memes

5434 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS