this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
122 points (87.7% liked)

Technology

69298 readers
4971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 109 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't used Opera since they switched from their own engine to chrome. They are now owned by a Chinese company, so it probably has at least as much tracking built into it as Google Chrome now.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I miss old opera before the buyout

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's essentially Vivaldi now.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apart from it being chromium based 😕

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have a look at Otter browser It aims to replicate the old interface. It is using QtWebEngine as Presto was closed source. It is in development since 10 years now. And it is open source.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

QtWebEngine is Chromium :(

It's Chromium all the way down.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Qt WebEngine uses code from the Chromium project. However, it is not containing all of Chrome/Chromium: Binary files are stripped out Auxiliary services that talk to Google platforms are stripped out, Source

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While that's one of the reasons I don't want to use chromium, it's not actually the main reason, if so I'd just use Ungoogled Chromium. I just want more web engines, and I dont want google to monopolise the internet.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is super hard to create a new web engine, especially when one company is influencing the web standards and most web developers are only testing against that because of market share. This is why we ended up with four active web engines. In alphabetical order: Blink, Gecko, Goanna, WebKit. Obviously some are related: WebKit started out as the fork of KDE’s KHTML and Blink is the fork of WebKit. Goanna is the fork of the Unified XUL Platform that was forked from Mozilla's Gecko.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, didn't know about this

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Vivaldi is made by many of the same people with similar features and vibe. It's also chromium-based, though.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used Fifth a bit, which is something aesthetically similar to old Opera made with fltk and a webkit port to fltk. But it's abandoned now.

It's so sad really, when I was a Windows user, it was Opera, when I moved to Linux, it was again Opera, then I also started using Conkeror (based on XULRunner).

Then Opera died. Then XULRunner died. No usable web browser anymore.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't you like Firefox? It's on both win and Linux.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I said "usable" ; it was usable when XULRunner was a thing (and you could use Firefox instead of just XULRunner).

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why the hell do I need this in a web browser? Why isn’t it a stand alone app?

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you think of LLMs as a thing to replace search bars then this kind of makes sense.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just more unnecessary browser bloat.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The more search bars the faster your internet becomes!

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

This is true. I asked my LLM.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you think of LLMs as a thing to replace search bars

I don't.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't tried LLMs myself, but even completely made up garbage would be better than today's search engine results.

You either get advertisements for things that have nothing to do with what you're trying to find or you get privacy preserving links to sites that have nothing to do with what you're trying to find.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago

There are plenty of stand-alone LLM apps.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Same reason people get their WiFi from their ISP Modem+Router combo, even though it's stupid to do so: People often confuse initial convenience for good.

[–] gunpachi 37 points 1 year ago

Thats a cool feature for sure but I don't trust opera.

[–] folak@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Can't they just stick to normal browser things like gaming integrations?

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Intresting. But I'm curious about the performance.

A bigger LLM (mixtral) already struggles to run on my mid-range gaming PC. Trying to run an LLM that isn't terrible on a standard laptop wouldn't be a good experience.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

What's LLM?