317
Sounds like obstruction, let's charge these traitors too.
Seems pretty organized too. Let's open a RICO investigation.
honestly this sounds like a really fun time to be a young, hungry attorney lol
and remember that death threats just means you're getting to them
Not being a criminal scumbag would have avoided the trials.
I guess it's too late for that though.
It's scary how much most Republicans don't give a shit about anything, they have no shame or anything remotely close to decency.
They accuse Democrats of foul play, and scream and shout about ti, even when there is nothing there, and we have evidence Republicans do 10 times worse.
It's insane that the Trump campaign in 2016 shouted lock her up about Hillary for having used the wrong mail account in some cases. Yet they have no problems with Trump doing 100 times worse, stealing documents, and using secret communications channels to talk to Putin for christ sake.
Trump supporters are traitors to USA and democratic values.
The coup marches on.
This is how you can tell they know he's guilty as fuck. All their protestations to the contrary, their actions show their beliefs clear as day.
They want to shut down any investigation/prosecution of anyone they deem to be above the law? So much for The Law and Order Party. Might as well toss that in the giant pile of lying slogans alongside Party of Small Government and Party of Personal Responsibility.
They are the Party of Hate and Fear.
I'd also accept the Fascist Party as an answer.
“Law and Order” has always been coded language for “Using the power of state to enforce a social and economic hierarchy”.
I've read a lot of reasons they give not to have a trial: "It's a political witch-hunt", "the American people should decide, not the judicial system", "prosecuting your political enemies is something banana republics do", and plenty of others. Not one of them is willing to say "he's innocent", though. They're all saying "we shouldn't look".
Kinda tells you everything you need to know, doesn't it?
Can we charge them with obstruction of justice and be done with it? Seriously…
WHY IS THIS NOT HAPPENING?
It's not happening because this is a particularly tricky legal situation... separation of powers, immunity, and no actual damage has been done yet.
So we wait until they disrupt a trial and allow a guilty piece of shit to walk?
Just one, and there are several
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON — Four criminal indictments of Donald Trump have ignited his followers and spurred his House Republican allies to try to use the upcoming government funding deadline of Sept. 30 as leverage to undermine the prosecutions.
As a result, Republicans are looking at ways to insert provisions in government funding legislation that would hinder federal and state prosecutors who have secured indictments of Trump, based on unproven claims that he’s being politically targeted.
The GOP desire to use Congress’ “power of the purse” to defend Trump, who is running for president again, took hold over the last two months and escalated after the latest indictment in Atlanta in connection with the ex-president’s attempt to overturn his 2020 election defeat based on fabricated claims of fraud.
House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is publicly calling for party leaders to insert provisions into government funding legislation that changes how the Justice Department can use money.
“Given the weighty federal interests at stake, the Committee is conducting oversight of this matter to determine whether any legislative reforms are appropriate or necessary,” Jordan wrote in a letter to Willis, giving her a Sept. 7 deadline to respond.
Republicans, under political pressure from their pro-Trump voters, have sought to belittle all four indictments brought against the former president, which include detailed allegations of illegal activities presented to grand juries in multiple jurisdictions.
The original article contains 1,139 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
they need to shut it down before their own crimes come to light
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
317 points (98.8% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3232 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS