609
submitted 7 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 171 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

~~Ukraine~~ United States is going to lose if Congress doesn't send more aid

The fact that everyone understands that the war in Ukraine is based on American backing means that it's a proxy war between the US and Russia.

[-] Melkath@kbin.social 110 points 7 months ago

$773 billion dollars last year spent on fighting "proxy" wars around the world (and if you count the spying, domestically).

The only one that America has actual moral footing to get behind is the only one we are pulling punches on.

[-] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 43 points 7 months ago

Hardly the first time. I'd argue the US made the same mistake in Afghanistan in 2003, diverting resources to Iraq because Bush Jr. had such a hard-on for Saddam.

[-] Melkath@kbin.social 19 points 7 months ago

100%

With each passing day, Biden's administration looks like the Bush administration's bigger more right wing brother.

Citizens United needs to be overturned. The Pentagon budget needs to be at least halved. We need the 2 party system to end.

This will never happen if we keep voting for the lesser evil every 4 years.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 7 months ago

mm, delicious bait! 😋 go on then, which proxy war does the US have "actual moral footing" to get behind?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 121 points 7 months ago

Yes, no shit. That was the outlook from day 1.

The Russian Army is largely represented as a bunch of baffoons in the Western media, but it's still one of the 3 largest armies in the world. Ukraine cannot hold their lines indefinitely, the only way to "win" against an opponent that has multiple times your materiel available is guerilla.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 7 months ago
[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

They so desperately want their own version of Putin in the US. Where they get to kill their political opponents when they like.

load more comments (9 replies)

The free world loses when Russia wins.

It's pretty much an invitation to China to do the same in Taiwan and an invitation for Russia to start more wars in eastern Europe.....

Helping Ukraine costs money. Not helping Ukraine costs even more.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 26 points 7 months ago

Does the free world also include places America has invaded or bombed?

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

Japan, SK, and Germany seem on board with aid to Ukraine... So yes

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"free world" has the same weight here as "state's rights"

Downvote and move on, but just like the American genocide in Iraq, you will realize I'm right in ~20 years

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The free world loses when Russia wins.

I'd pay good money to watch the Anglos crash and burn tbh. Like, PPV amounts of money. At this point it might be the only way to avert climate collapse; if possible at all, and I have no material reason to want to see you propagate or prosper. Die faster; and do a backflip on your way down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[-] Alsjemenou@lemy.nl 76 points 7 months ago

People in this thread clearly don't understand what the implications are. There is a very clear danger of war on the European continent that will involve NATO and by proxy the US. Aid for Ukraine is the absolute cheapest option. Europe is not going to just let Ukraine fall and will ramp up their involvement. We already have France willing to send troops.

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 7 months ago

You don't understand that the only danger of further war is again from US/NATO. Europe is going to let Ukraine fall because it has no choice. France is a laughing stock. Even what they threatened to send could do nothing.

In the case of shells, the problem isn’t money, it’s lack of production capacity. Even the mighty USA, owner of the largest military-industrial complex in the world, can only produce 28,000 rounds of 155mm per month – less than 10pc of what Ukraine needs – and this with its factories on 24-hour operation.

Comment from the Torygrapgh readership:

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 24 points 7 months ago

the US is already involved by proxy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 74 points 7 months ago

It is a bad idea to trust and rely on Ameeica. Some Afgans learned this lesson in 2021, the same is happening to Ukraine now.

[-] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 47 points 7 months ago
[-] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 7 months ago

Gaddafi's is just sad. Such a terrible decision to give up their nuclear deterrence and trust western governments.

Nukes are why the DPRK hasn't been invaded again, and why it hasn't ended up Libya is now.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 16 points 7 months ago

Ukraine gave up their nukes in exchange for peace with Russia, then got invaded by Russia.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago

Biden frantically sends more aid to israel

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

nice job america, now in addition to everything else, you've lost a war you weren't even fighting in. Fuck yeah!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Definately NOT proxy cannon fodder

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 21 points 7 months ago

Countries will get fed up of sending aid to Ukraine long before Russia decides to return its annexed territories. We're already seeing signs of that.

If NATO isn't willing to go in and force the Russians out themselves, I fail to see how this war is anything but a net gain for Russia. They will just sit back and let their "new territories" become more and more Russified.

To me, the aid is just a delaying tactic to allow Ukraine to continue fighting until the west can figure out a way to accept that Ukraine has lost its territories without losing face.

It's a shit show, but I don't share the optimism that a lot of people have for a Ukrainian victory. It's like a game of chess, and it's currently Ukraine/NATOs turn, because the Russians are already dug in.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Ukraine is already losing and unless something crazy happens they will lose.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

That's why Congress doesn't want to send more aid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago

Can't wait until this shit is over so that all the shit-for-brains boomers finally take down all their stupid flags.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
609 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32318 readers
780 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS