182
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

According to the complaint, the company contradicted its privacy promises. From 2020-2022, the company allegedly disclosed users’ personal information, including their health information, to numerous third-party advertising platforms via tracking technologies, known as pixels and application programming interfaces (APIs), which Monument integrated into its website. Monument used the information to target ads for its services to both current users who subscribe to the lowest cost memberships and to target new consumers, according to the complaint.

Monument used these pixels and APIs to track “standard” and “custom events,” meaning instances in which consumers interacted with Monument’s website. The FTC says that Monument gave the custom events descriptive titles that revealed details about its users such as “Paid: Weekly Therapy” or “Paid: Med Management,” when a user signed up for a service. Monument disclosed this custom events information to advertising platforms along with users’ email addresses, IP addresses, and other identifiers, which enabled third parties to identify the users and associate the custom events with specific individuals, according to the complaint.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nulluser@programming.dev 35 points 7 months ago

Wait. Am I reading this right? Their punishment for doing something that they weren't supposed to be doing is just to stop doing it?

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago

In addition to the ban on sharing data with third parties for advertising, the proposed order with Monument, which must be approved by a federal court before it can go into effect, also prohibits the company from misrepresenting its data collection and disclosure practices and imposes a $2.5 million civil penalty for violating OARFPA, which will be suspended due to the company’s inability to pay.

They didn't make enough money with this data selling to pay this fine ? Right.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You get a fine you can't pay? Sorry that's illegal. Jail or seized assets. If you have no assets, just jail and garnished wages. Good luck paying your fine on 23 cents a week (minus taxes)

This company gets a fine it can't pay? "okay you don't have to pay, just pinky swear you won't do it again, now here's a bailout go play with the other rich kids (and leave the poors to me cracks knuckles)"

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

They spent it all on cocaine and hookers

[-] protist@mander.xyz 12 points 7 months ago

Large scale "online therapy" companies are a pox on the therapy profession. All the therapists who work for them are made contractors, they pay poorly, and the turnover is high, so the quality to the consumer is poor. Between companies like Monument and Better Help and private equity buying therapy practices left and right, access to high quality therapy is harder to get than ever.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

Just look at SWORD. insurance companies are now trying to have you do physical therapy in your own home via AI.

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

corporations are hilariously dystopian sometimes.

this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
182 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

32033 readers
765 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS