297
hey, kill the planet more because it's too expensive not too. Sound logic....
What are we trying to cheap out here m
Yeah but venture capitalists can't make money off of it if they don't! Think of the share holders!
So it's a way?
It's like addressing a wound by mopping up all the blood and injecting it back into your body. Good luck.
It's... It's nothing like that. Literally not like that at all.
Pulling carbon out of the air instead of addressing pollution at the source is not like continuously mopping up blood instead of treating the wound? To me the parallels are almost exact.
And, besides everything mentioned, it would create several mountains and hills (from all that solid state carbon).
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
297 points (98.1% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5394 readers
149 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS