194
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 72 points 6 months ago

"Merchan said Tuesday that he will rule on the contempt charges at a later time."

When? Punishment should have been imposed long ago.

[-] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 41 points 6 months ago

Hopefully he's just biding his time and giving him enough rope to hang himself with.

So far Merchan has not seemed like a pushover in this trial and right now I trust he knows what he's doing.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

I hope he's stacking the contempt charges just in case there's a successful appeal, then those charges will be sufficient to put his ass away for the rest of his life.

A man can dream

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I have zero trust for "there will be consequences later." I've been seeing that over and over and over for years. If the judge says this is obviously contempt and chooses not to address that now, I am no longer capable of optimism.

I need that gif of Jon Oliver with the "We got him!" banner.

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago

Judge Merchant to the Trump defense team: “I just want to make you aware… the People have presented 10 exhibits. You have presented nothing.”

A common refrain.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

and attacking Merchan’s adult daughter on social media, claiming, without evidence, that she was a “rabid Trump hater.”

She don’t need evidence. Anyone who’s not a pithed fox news / talk radio / Qanut streamer dipshit is a rabid trump hater. Because he’s a demented rapist fraud who attempted a coup barely five minutes ago. Fucker would have been handled already in any other time and place. Christ.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 months ago

He walked past seven rows of spectators, among them attorney George Conway, a vocal anti-Trumper now estranged from wife and former top Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, as well as reporters from every major media outlet, domestic and international.

That’s such a weird fucking relationship.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Trump's lawyer responded, "Lost my whatsthatnow?"

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Thank you. So not used to dailybeast being an adblocker-bitching piece of shit.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

With all this losing, when will there be “no credibility?” Can he take out a creditability loan from a bank? Can he sell some more junk stocks to launder more credibility?

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

So here's what the judge should do: Put Trump in jail for contempt for 1 hour.

Trump won't be able to resist exploding about how this is the worst thing, etc. He'll belly-ache for days about it.

The rest of the world will collectively roll its eyes. All the "oh, but we can't punish a president" people will clutch their pearls and whine about how we're all going to hell.

Lather, rinse and repeat this every future time Trump violates the gag order. Maybe bump it to 2 hours.

Eventually, people will figure out that putting Trump in prison won't bring the End Times. Trump will realize that he's completely run out whatever sympathy and attention his 3 remaining supporters can conjure. The justice system will eventually just forget to release him after his hour is up.

[-] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Y'all didn't hit a paywall? I wanted to read that article.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you search for the article headline on google, you'll find other versions of the same article on different news sites. For example, I found this version on yahoo.com.

Personally though, I use Firefox with uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger, and Bypass Paywalls Clean add-ons and rarely get blocked by paywalls.

Edit: I just noticed that @Zerlyna has already posted a link to https://archive.ph/HTxA2 which is a non-paywalled copy of the article.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I use an ad-blocker and that seems to work on the Daily Beast

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
194 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS