44
submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/physics@mander.xyz
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

tl;dr:

Peter Schauss at the University of Virginia says the wave packet is such a well-understood component of quantum theory that the findings of the new experiment are not surprising – but they do show that the researchers had a high degree of control over the processes used to cool and then precisely image the atoms.

I'm not entirely sure what they mean by having images of their waviness, because that is not how it works. You can not measure a quantum wave, because it isn't a "particle" wave but a wave-like distribution of mutually exclusive measurement outcomes. Taking a picture is the same as entangling yourself, which embeds you in the quantum wave function such that it describes all possible combinations of you ending up with every possible outcome.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago
[-] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago

As I understand it, they are making measurements of an otherwise single isolated particle as it moves about in a controlled space, and the measurements confirm (yet again) that the measurement outcomes match the probabilities given by the Schrödinger equation, which means that it interferes with itself.

The language used may lead some to think that we now have images showing a wave-like particle, but again, that's not something that can ever happen. What we have are boring old images of a single classical-looking particle, but the patterns they display tells us that quantum mechanics is very much at play in between the takes.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 6 months ago

Archive link: https://archive.is/jk2GY

This is... weird, although it does fit the theory well. And fucking cool.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Physics

1332 readers
21 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS