I think I have two question about this:

First, in this hyper capitalistic society, isn't everything bad for the poor, from the legal system to democracy itself. For example you can argue the poor lacks the time and resource to properly understand the policy, hence more likely to be misled by the candidate.

And in this specific cases, the public can pay for it if the person is poor enough, like declaring bankrupt. I am not so familiar with the procedure and loopholes related to bankrupt, so feel free to educate me on that.

On the other hand, I don't think rich people should be able to get away from jail time simply because they have paid money. Unfortunately this is seen through out our legal system. So I am definitely not supporting that. But I imagine the law can be easily changed to add the child care/medicare cost to the existing manslaughter sentence, instead of replacing the manslaughter sentence?

I honestly don't care if a poor person is worse than "beggared" by the sentence.

Thing is, the rich person should be, too. Make it scale based on available resources.

I think around 90% of all available money on the poor end to 99.999% on the rich end is fair. Or I'm the case of Bezos-level richies, leave them with about $5 a year to live on.

This mistake should essentially completely ruin the drunk's entire life permanently. No reason to spare them any misery. There's no other way to make it a law not worth breaking into you make it absolutely impossible to live with doing it.

There are issues to work on about who receives the money to prevent further problems, but it's a start.