[OpenCritic] Homeworld 3 Reviews (80 Top Critic Average 75% Critics Recommend) (opencritic.com)

submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

-IGN 8 / 10

-PC Gamer 77 / 100

-GamesRadar +3.5 / 5

-TheSixthAxis 7 / 10

-Shacknews 9 / 10

-GamingTrend 100 / 100

-Wccftech 8.5 / 10

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Review sites have historically been almost worthless in judging how good a game is (user reviews are where it is at). However, I'm really hoping this game is good. Homeworld 2 was great; another installment would be quite welcome.

[-] bishoponarope@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I got in on the 72 hour early access and have spent quite some hours in hw3, because it's so beautiful and such a return to the brilliant originals, with all the modern bells and whistles. I'm going back to play more now, but seriously, this game is just fantastic.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Promising. Not that I trust game reviewers to do a 3D RTS that hasn't had an entry in over a decade, justice.

[+] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -7 points 6 months ago

-GamingTrend 100 / 100

That seems sus.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 6 months ago

The signature is a great idea. This should become more popular where people attach licenses to their content. Lemmy would then make it optional to display the content license.

These are just growing pains of a evolving ecosystem. But net net all of these additions are good

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 10 points 6 months ago

To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

Originally, I just had the Creative Commons license number, with no description, but then someone was complaining about not knowing what that was.

So then I changed it to just be a description of what it is, with no license number, but then someone was complaining about that.

So then I had both at a regular font size, but someone was complaining about that, so I shrunk the font, to be less conspicuous.

But then some Android/Apple clients don't display the Lemmy subscript/superscript fonts formatting properly, and I get people telling me it looks ugly, so I have to tell them to get their UI clients devs to fix their client issues with fonts, or to use the web client UI.

And finally, now, I have both the description and the license number in there, in a smaller font, and educating some people about their mobile clients formatting smaller fonts bugs, aaannnnndd, somebody's still complaining about that.

If it bothers you that much, Feel. Free. To. Block. Me.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The formatting is broken btw, at least looks that way on Thunder. Like there is an extra whitespace before the ] and hence, it looks like text and not a link.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

The formatting is broken btw, at least looks that way on Thunder. Like there is an extra whitespace before the ] and hence, it looks like text and not a link.

There's an issue with some Android / Apple clients that don't render subscript and superscript fonts correctly. The web client doesn't have this issue.

You'll need to speak with the devs of your client to have that fixed.

You can refer them to this page, that has the formatting instructions: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/en/users/02-media.html

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 months ago

it could say 'anti AI thingy'. Small and descriptive.

But what does it do?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

it could say ‘anti AI thingy’. Small and descriptive.

Your description is missing one of the key points of it though.

But what does it do?

If you want the layman's version, look at the 'Canonical URL' link at towards the top of the page, and that'll get you to a laymans summary for the license.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Your comment signature is spam

One person's spam is another person's licensing of their content.

Feel free to block me, if you don't want to see it.

and you should feel bad.

This is the Internet. We're all supposed to feel bad/angry all the time about everything, apparently.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Just curious, where does the Anti Commercial-AI bit come from? The page linked does not include that term in the title or summary, and from what I understand of the legal situation it wouldn't make a difference to explicitly mention AI.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

Just curious, where does the Anti Commercial-AI bit come from? The page linked does not include that term in the title or summary,

It's a description of the purpose of using the license.

and from what I understand of the legal situation it wouldn’t make a difference to explicitly mention AI.

Best not to hijack the OP's post by discussing this here. There's a different post that goes into depth on the subject and of the usage of the license.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024

45 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16749 readers

778 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works