this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
293 points (100.0% liked)

196

17981 readers
1507 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 102 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The good thing about this is that I will never attract these guys.

[–] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 68 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tell me about your philtrum.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wrong answer! You're a -10/10, now you will never know my girth

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's fine, I know my own

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

Party on, girth.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Congrats! You don't have fetal alcohol syndrome!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Oh no your lack of belief in my actractiveness to you has made me attracted to you.

What do you do?

  1. Roll a d20 this is a DnD scenario now.

  2. Ew, well I am not attracted to you, internet stranger.

  3. Wait, what if you were a woman? That would be less icky.

  4. Ugh comments like this prove humanity has gone backward.

I am bored all of these are acceptable answers...

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Xanvial@lemmy.one 77 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

This is satire, right?

right?

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's not. That subreddit is garbage. The mods legit ban people if the user rates people higher than the mod wants.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kartonrealista@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You get these guys in a room with any objectively good-looking woman in real life, and they would freeze up.

[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 years ago

They don't freeze in fear. They freeze because they are analyzing that philtrum.

[–] solinus@lemmy.cafe 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

they have a point

clearly cute nerdy girls with glasses or tomboys are superior smh 😤😤.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't care if it's knitting or being a tank mechanic, a girl nerding out over her interests is hella cute.

Or anyone else, for that matter.

[–] eodur@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

100%, nerding is hot. That look of excitement and focus does a whole lot.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Right? A person telling you all about that thing they're passionate about is straight up beaming when they do it, I love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vlaxtocia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

MFers out here rating women like they're dogs at fucking crufts

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Didn't she post the picture and asked people to rate her?

I agree that it's ridiculous and insane but if she asked for being superficially rated and she gets that.... You really can't blame the guys rating her.

Almost everyone is uglier than this girl anyway. If she is a 7, we are 3. :)

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 64 points 2 years ago (1 children)

most posts on there are incels taking pics from girls social media and pretending to post as the girl

[–] VelvetGentleman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This does not make it less moral, just more sad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cubedsteaks@lemmy.today 13 points 2 years ago

Didn’t she post the picture and asked people to rate her?

more like a bot posted that picture.

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 45 points 2 years ago

why did you have to expose me to this nonsense

[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 38 points 2 years ago
[–] Nikki@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Actually she's quite a 8 or 9 rather for my score. You should checkout my ratemywomen page as well /s

[–] OmegaMouse@feddit.uk 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No way, please tell me that subreddit is satire 😱

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

nah unfortunately it's a safe space for incels

[–] LostDeer@infosec.pub 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is that why the text they wrote was so disturbing to read? Have they lived in an echo chamber for so long that they think it’s okay to talk about a person like they’re a cadaver. F’ing creepy

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On one hand, rating peoples' appearance is the whole point of that subreddit, but on the other hand... My God, do these guys have a talent for making it disgustingly creepy.

I wouldn't even expect actual cosmetic surgeons to talk like that.

[–] xxxSexMan69xxx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago

They rate according to extremely rigid rules which, aside from being racist, are ridiculously unfair.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flamingmongoose@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 years ago (18 children)

What do you have to look like to achieve more than a 7? A biblically accurate angel?

[–] toiletwhole@feddit.de 22 points 2 years ago

Totally would hit that.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Yes. Specifically this one

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 10 points 2 years ago

Too many eyes but not fat or disfigured. 4/10.

The whole thing is designed to allow them to call people (especially women) "mid". They arbitrarily chose to use a gaussian distribution pattern so they had an excuse not to give anyone a score beyond 6s.

But real answer is be a hugely successful fashion model who the sub creator found attractive. Then their "objective rating standards" would include arbitrary criteria to bundle your face in. The whole sub could be replaced with a trivial ML model if it were actually about just giving their "objective" ratings. The internal weights used by the ML model would make about as much sense as the crap spouted in the screenshot.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aren't biblically accurate angels androgynous?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

They're fucked up is what they are. See above and also this

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 years ago

oh yeah this is why im sapphic

[–] tram1@programming.dev 20 points 2 years ago

this is actually insanity...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Idk she’d be prettier if she talked to a therapist about her insecurity in her appearance

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I know most Lemmy user's have a hate boner for Reddit for many other reasons than this, but IMO all of the /r/AmIUgly, /r/AmISexy, /r/rateme, and other rating subreddits are an absolute cancer on the site.

90% of posts are from new accounts with questionable verification methods, with the others being people trying to shill their OF profiles. I can accept that, but what really boils my piss is that almost all of the comments follow this pattern:

  • Slating anyone remotely attractive for being attention seeking, or posting incorrectly on a sub "intended for ugly people", all while that person only comments on the attractive people.
  • Obvious negging, as if giving some super attractive girl a 6/10 is going to make them jump into their DM's and ask "what can I do to be better for you sempai?"
  • The inevitable stalking of their account, attempt to give into their DM's, or reverse image search that ends up with a post on these subs gaining you 100 new IG followers and some thirsty cunts liking and commenting on your pics.
  • Toxic behaviour when someone tries to actually be nice, or to offer some friendly advice. If I had a penny for every time a woman commented on a post on those subs with some advice, only for some guy to shit on them and say "lol no they need to go to the gym"

Obviously, these subs are going to exist, but they just make me end up hating people, because it's always the same pattern.

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 years ago

Dudes out here comparing phrenology notes like that shit still valid.

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm giving her a 11 out of 10

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›