137
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 months ago

Maybe we should hold federal money due to climate change events if the state isn't trying to make progress against climate change.

[-] Dreizehn@kbin.social 19 points 5 months ago

The Government of Putin will continue their "drill baby drill" for the oil industry, who wrecked the coastline in the first place.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Louisiana has lost its damned mind. Ever since the old Democratic governor ran out of terms they've just been speed-running Florida.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I dunno so much about the rest of the state, but New Orleans has been sinking since it was founded.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 19 points 5 months ago

Large parts of the state are uncompacted sediment. It does compress and settle as a result. There are a bunch of things you can do though:

  • Stop extracting and burning fossil fuels to slow sea level rise
  • Stop the oil and gas industry from cutting channels through marshes, which causes them to erode quickly
  • Divert sediment from the Mississippi to wetland restoration, raising land levels
  • Help people move when that's the best remaining option
[-] SmurfNuts@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

There goes Landry fucking us over. Called it a long time ago. The shit weasel has been primed and ready to drag this already completely fucked state into the ground. I hope the dopes that voted for this asshat are happy.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Doesn't that mean less Louisiana? Isn't that a good thing?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

"Good good! Your pride will be your downfall"

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Time to invest in parcels of land a bit further (currently) inland as they will be prime oceanfront real estate in a decade.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And then gone a little after that.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No.. then You lobby the government to finally take action against coastal erosion and rake in those sweet sweet public billions to protect your private investment.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5244 readers
209 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS