399
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago
load more comments (69 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago

Kennedy was eliminated in the first round of voting after receiving support from 19 delegates, or just 2.07% of delegates.

Earlier, Libertarian Party Chair Angela McArdle had ruled that former president Donald J. Trump was not even qualified to be considered for nomination because he did not submit the proper nominating papers. Trump, however, received six write-in votes -- defeating Stormy Daniels, Denali the Cat, and Sean Ono Lennon.

I mean, if it was Stormy v Biden, we might have us a horse race . . . But it ain’t.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I imagine the Stormy write-ins were trolling Trump

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Good. He should be rejected by everyone. First libertarians boo Trump, then they reject Brainworm.

They were right twice in the same 24 hour period. The adage about broken clocks is true.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Nitpick: Stopped, not broken. A stopped clock is right twice a day. A broken clock may never be right at all.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

It's really the end times when Libertarians seem like the more well-adjusted, rational crowd compared to Republicans.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I dunno, I think they booed because trump isn't insane enough, and they probably realize rfk Jr was an op to steal dem votes from biden.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 months ago

... If they set up a hologram of John McAfee, with Ai voice mod, like a VTuber sort of, I am 100% certain it would win.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Eh, he lost the nomination every time he ran iirc

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Dude was like the tiger King with a bit more cocaine

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

Make Whalefucking Great Again!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

It's too bad the worm didn't have what it took to finish the job.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Yo know you fucked up when the people normally telling everyone to shhhhh are making noise by booing you.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 10 points 5 months ago

I wish this was cause for hope, but polls are still showing Trump neck and neck usually with a 2% lead over Biden. It's really going to come down to at least two, probably three, swing states. Given that some of them allow the EC vote to be split, there is even a possibility of a Tie.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

The last couple of elections have shown the polls to be unreliable with a distinct bias favoring Republicans in appearance. Last I heard the popular theory was boomers are more likely to answer random calls and have time for a bunch of questions.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

No. The polls do swing about 4% but it’s in a random direction in every election no matter what.

Almost no polls use landline random digit dialing exclusively anymore. Some call cell phones, some do online surveys or in person surveys, and some do focus groups.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] HANN@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Whatever happens will happen. We don't have control over the outcome only our efforts. Do what you can now to fight for what you believe. Stressing over polls doesn't help.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
399 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS