34
submitted 5 months ago by juicy@lemmy.today to c/politics@lemmy.world

On May 17 and 18 the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee and the Truth Project asked 36,139 Arab Americans and “allied voters,” "Who are you voting for in November?" 2,196 people responded.

2% Trump

7% Biden

25% Jill Stein

20% Cornell West

19% Undecided

23% Uncommitted

3% Stay home

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 5 months ago

well whatever you do, dont support the one side that doesnt want to take voting rights away from brown people.

im sure everything will turn out groovy for arab americans under trump. vote your conscience!

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Yeah hey man I’m a white middle upper class straight white guy. I don’t want the orange turd to win but if he does I’m probably pretty low on the death squad hit list.

These guys on the other hand…

[-] bobburger@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago

I'll at least enjoy some nice tax cuts if they get Trump elected, so there's a silver lining for me.

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Yup same. I’ll just go full hedonist tbh

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

'Support the side killing brown people' is what this read like

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Look, I get it, Brandon is captive to AIPAC. But Trump is clearly the worst option, the one person who will catalyze more death. You got two bad choices, but at least Brandon preserves some semblance of hope for the future.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 17 points 5 months ago

That's probably why Biden is at 7% to Trump's 2%.

[-] bobburger@fedia.io 8 points 5 months ago

A little context:

According the Arab American Institute less than 1% of American citizens are Arab American.

Arab Americans do make up significant voting blocks in Michigan and Pennsylvania. Even though they are an extremely small minority, they may have to power to cost Joe Biden these key swing states and hand the election to Donald Trump.

Most older Americans support Biden's response to Israel according to this poll. On the other hand younger Americans largely disapprove of his response. There's a lot more nuance than given in my brief summary, this is just to illustrate the diversity of opinion among voters.

Joe Biden needs to balance rejecting young Americans who are unreliable voters and Arab Americans who are a very small minority with rejecting older Americans who are a large reliable voting block. Again there's a lot more nuance here that I'm not going to go into, I'm merely pointing out that no matter what choice Joe Biden makes it's going to alienate some voters and could potentially hand the election to Trump.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This isn't a real poll. I expect the numbers are terrible, but these numbers are worthless. They pushed a question to 30,000 people they identified as Arab American or "allies", I'm guessing their mailing list or social media followers, and got an extremely low response rate. And since they only asked a single question (i.e., no demographics), even if this was a random sample, they would have no way of rebalancing it to represent the broader population.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] juicy@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

A poll published at the end of October 2023 found "only 17% of Arab American voters saying they will vote for Biden in 2024—a staggering drop from 59% in 2020."

Then a couple weeks ago a NYT poll "found Trump leading among registered Middle Eastern, North African or Muslim voters in the swing states, with 57 percent saying they were planning to back him in November. Only 25 percent said they were supporting Biden."

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

So an 8% increase for Biden? Hard to view that as a negative.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

59% in 2020 to 25% in 2024 is a decrease of 34% for Biden.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Sure and I imagine most all of that decline is due to the Israel/Gaza war. That he's gained 8% back since it started, while being heavily criticized for his handling of it, seems like a win.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

Except you're comparing apples to oranges. The October poll was national while the most recent poll was just done in battleground states.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

You forget: any poll centrists don't like must be faulty and too far out from the election.

[-] Tamoato@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For everyone here calling these Arab Americans idiots for not voting for Biden because Trump will be worse, this is what political disgagement and lack of hope look like.

They know Trump will be worse. They also know that Biden will keep enabling this ongoing genocide.

They believe, rightfully so, that their vote won't end the suffering.

A bunch of smug dem voters telling them "Trump will be worse you dumb fuck" isn't going to change a thing.

[-] thechadwick@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

CIS had an interesting chat with John Mearscheimer about Israel that's unsurprising, but worth the listen. The host commented with a running joke that, "having been strongly supportive of Netanyahu after October 7, Joe Biden is seriously invested in the two-state solution—Michigan and Pennsylvania (@1:17:38)

Tough sell. Sure it's obvious who will make the situation measurably worse in nearly every way, but it's really hard to motivate and mobilize a voting block on harm reduction, when the incumbent elicits strongly emotional revulsion right now.

Recency bias, negativity bias, etc. are so hard to overcome. It's like trying to logic your way out of an argument someone has emotion'd themselves into. You may know the answer conceptually, but actually feeling ok about it enough to act isn't a logic proposition. It's one of the most emotionally charged decisions we make.

Not a demographic I'd be counting on showing up in large numbers if I we're a campaign strategist. Sadly, Trump is retaining well over 90% of his voting coalition from 2020, whereas Biden is only retaining a fraction of his (very diverse) block. Since the election will come down to a very small number of votes, he's going to need all of his 2020 coalition to show up. 4 years of reality make that a hard bargain for Arab Americans and Republicans who held their noses after Jan 6 and voted blue though. Ugh.

Link to the video: https://youtu.be/kAfIYtpcBxo

Piped bot, assemble!

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the rec! I'll give it a listen.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 5 months ago

Based on this I now assume at least half of the "I'm not voting" people are actually voting for Kayne.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are you puzzled by these numbers? Are you asking, "How could they think letting Trump win is going to make anything better?" Well, if you genuinely want to understand, read this reporting by Slate.

Here are some highlights:

I heard a similar sentiment from another patron, Fares, a Palestinian man who became a U.S. citizen 20 years ago, and voted for Biden in 2020. “I feel like, whether Republicans or Democrats, it’s all the same,” he said. “I don’t think I’m going to vote for any because it doesn’t matter.” It’s a major shift for him. He was born in Syria to parents exiled in 1948 from what is now Haifa. He told me he hadn’t missed a presidential election before, but now he doesn’t see a point. “If 12,000 dead kids don’t change their hearts, you think you or I will?”

...

In a conversation at Qahwah House, Elabed seemed tired. It had become obvious to her she could no longer support Biden, and she didn’t see why that was so hard to understand. “It is hard for me to reconcile my core beliefs and morals to support a president that dehumanizes my people,” Elabed said. “This is a president that I met in person. That knows my sister. That met my mom, who wore a traditional Palestinian thobe at the White House.”

...

I posed the obvious question, asking if she thought Trump would be better. “What’s worse than genocide?” she retorted. “Maybe if the Democrats lose this election, they’ll learn their lesson. I’m happy to take several steps back if that’s what it takes to take a step forward.” When I argued, I got thousand-yard stares.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I’m happy to take several steps back if that’s what it takes to take a step forward

I don't think this woman truly understands what it would mean to go back several steps. Or she just thinks those steps back won't affect her in any way. Wish I could be that oblivious to the world around me.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

I imagine watching your extended family suffer under an artificial famine while dodging bombs and shells raises your tolerance for discomfort while punishing those responsible.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

WATCHING being the key word there. She's not living through it. This is happening half a world away and she's willing to make this even worse? Does she think Trump's new travel ban (which he's gone on record as saying will be brought back) will have an exception for her family? Does she think Trump will suddenly say "Actually I was joking when I said 'finish the job'"?

[-] firecat@kbin.social -3 points 5 months ago

I think you Americans are not understanding. It should have not gotten to be this bad, it shouldn’t repeat, the law should have worked and put people in jail. The fact that nothing works and the choice won’t matter, means they are better off hiding in public than caring about you Americans dumb little election.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It should have not gotten to be this bad, it shouldn’t repeat

No one is arguing against this, especially not around here.

The fact that nothing works and the choice won’t matter, means they are better off hiding in public than caring about you Americans dumb little election.

The choice won't matter to me because I'm an upper-middle-class, Jewish, Millennial, white male. However, not everyone has the luxury of acting like the choice doesn't matter. It just blows my mind how there are folks who want to support Palestinians but refuse to see a difference between the 2 major candidates.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Maybe if the Democrats lose this election, they’ll learn their lesson.

That has never been the case.

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ah so theyre too ignorant and uneducated to realize whats at stake.

To clarify: "We're teaching the democrats a lesson by voting for Trump."

Bitch if the Orange rat gets elected, there wont be future elections.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

I guess they want to be exiled / deported?

[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago

Diaper Don is a moron!

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
34 points (77.4% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3348 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS