412
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nuke@sh.itjust.works 69 points 5 months ago

Less bloodshed... for us

Way way more bloodshed for you

[-] Shipgirlboy@sh.itjust.works 60 points 5 months ago

The purpose of a soldier is not to die for his country, it is to make the other dumb bastards die for theirs.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Username rather pointedly relevant

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure the blood gets vaporized before it can be shed.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I think enhanced radiation weapons make for plenty of blood

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago

Maxim's inspiration:

“I was in Vienna, where I met an American whom I had known in the States,” Maxim told the Times of London. “He said: ‘Hang your chemistry and electricity! If you want to make a pile of money, invent something that will enable these Europeans to cut each other’s throats with greater facility.’ ”

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

I doubt that this is even remotely accurate. Even the slightest bit of critical thinking quickly dismantles that "belief".

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 45 points 5 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jordan_Gatling#Gatling_gun

In 1877, he wrote, "It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine gun which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a large extent supersede the necessity of large armies, and consequently, exposure to battle and disease would be greatly diminished."

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Why would he not realize that countries, generals, kings, and those in power would simply send more men to die? They will not send 2 guys with a machine gun and then simply accept that the battle was lost if their guy loses. No, they will send a million men, as many as are needed to take another foot of ground.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

Colonialism was super popular, so a couple of dudes with machine guns could mow down a field of natives with much less risk.

Plus a machine gun is much more impressive than some dudes with single fire guns. A platoon (or whatever fits on a boat or three) can be overrun. Throw a couple of machine guns in with a couple of brutal shows of force and you got yourself a colony.

WW1 was still a ways off and it wasn't really the target market for your Gatlings and Maxims.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

That's actually a really good point. He must have meant that fewer "civilized" soldiers would die.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 5 months ago

It's more likely he just didn't think of them at all.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

He was clearly not a stupid man by any means, but definitely seems like he was naive.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

It's the cotton gin logic. Eli Whitney thought his invention the cotton gin would reduce the need for manual labor on cotton plantations and reduce slavery. Instead it made cotton farming more profitable and revitalized slavery.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago

I think this is an instance of Jevon's paradox.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 15 points 5 months ago

He didn't said which side and how though, so the statement of "reducing number of soldier" could be true to the side using the gatling and also the side getting shot at.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the first one starts with less and the second one ends up with les

[-] halvar@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Csávó tiszta hülye vágod

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
412 points (99.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
519 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS