[-] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

You're talking about old-school reddiquette, which even reddit itself forgot eons ago: upvote well thought-out comments even if you disagree with them. And I actually do that to a degree, even if I dislike the author's point. But if I think the comment is wrong in some way then I downvote it. That's not to say I want the author silenced, just that the down button is there to be used sometimes.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It's absolutely true. Look at the DNC policy from 20+ years ago, and you'd think it looks like RNC policy of today. Moving leftward is part and parcel of the notion of "Progressive" politics — moving progressively leftward.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

You can advocate for free speech while downvoting the content of the speech. That's the whole principle of free speech. It's not just for the content we upvote; it's specifically for the content we downvote.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I don't condone murder under any circumstances. But using 56 murders as an excuse to silence anyone online is a disgrace to the principle of free speech.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Yes, everyone whose point of view differs from yours must obviously be inferior to you.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

What kind of absurd hyperbole is that? Nobody has called for murder. And certainly nobody has committed a murder based on a call for it.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you never heard "sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me"? It's preschool 101. Speech is never an act of violence.

Additionally, nobody is debating anyone's right to exist.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

A group of patrons sitting at a table in a bar, quietly discussing their TERF perspective, is entirely different from one of them walking up to a trans table and picking a fight. The former is an exercise of free speech, whereas the latter is cause for ejection.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I was active in r/Conservative, and here I'm the primary contributer to m/Conservative. Hi, nice to meet you. When I'm engaged in arguments involving the word "fascist", it's rarely me using that word (unless we're literally discussing Mussolini), and usually me who's called that for favoring levelheaded conservative principles. I enjoy mutually respectful debate, but I find most others prefer to fearfully call me a "fascist," downvote everything I've ever written, block me, and walk away feeling sanctimonious.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The "far right" is growing because the left keeps moving further left, and normal people realize they're now considered conservative.

If you want an echo chamber, go on and kick me out. You reap what you sow.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall fight to the death to defend your right to say it.

When you ban people, you tell them to go form an echo chamber where they'll flourish.

A more intelligent approach is to imitate Daryl Davis, who has convinced hundreds of KKK members to leave the KKK, simply by respectfully talking with them.

You might actually learn a thing or two in the process.

[-] 10A@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

I realized I was mistaken, deleted my comment, and then saw your reply. You're right, and I'm sorry.

0
submitted 1 year ago by 10A@kbin.social to c/linux@kbin.social

He's short and fat, but he's not supposed to be that short and fat. The image's x-y ratio was altered.

view more: next ›

10A

joined 1 year ago