Wow. Reading through those Descriptions is rough. Many of them involve the cop lying with verbal testimony not matching bodycam footage. One I saw was after the guy was already restrained, he bit the cop's finger, so the cop shot him. Others show that they are looking for (or will make up) any excuse to shoot: one person had a lighter in their hand which caused the cop to shoot and kill them. It's honestly disgusting that people will go out of their way to defend this system. I guess that's a level of privelege that I just don't understand; how can you possibly be sure you'll never be in such a situation with a lying, murderous police officer?

Silence trimming is something you need to be careful of. If you listen to any comedy podcasts or storytelling, silence (pauses) have meaning and value. If you just listen to news or talk podcasts, its pretty nice to have. I have it turned on or off for selected podcasts, and it tells me it's trimmed over 1 full day of silence from my listening.

Not just a rapist, a child rapist.

Correct.

I think Lemmy needs a little bit of work on how blocking a user works. It gets confusing seeing new comments come through and not being able to see what they're replying to. You also have no option to report a comment if you can't see it. Even if you click the "show context" button, knowing that you're about to force a blocked user's comment to show, it just refuses. You have to open in an incognito tab and click show context. Basically, I want the ability to not see their comments in general, and not see them on the "new comments" feed, but if I explicitly ask to see their comments, let me do that.

I have blocked a large number of users who have consistently added nothing to conversation, or who routinely resort to personal attacks.

I am truly frustrated and disappointed that so many people:

• feel it acceptable to personally attack another commenter
• accuse everyone who disagrees with them of being a paid shill, or a troll
• use "shut down" words, with the intent to either entirely discredit the person they're responding to, or end the conversation where it is
• literally copy-and-paste the same reply all over a thread or targeting a person[^1]
• make bold claims with no sources, and when you reply correcting them and provide sources of your own, they downvote and don't reply
• engage in conspiracy thinking and go on imaginative expeditions, where connection to reality is secondary to consistency with their beliefs

I know it's naive to think people will be able to always get along. And I guess it is naive to assume that people actually want to learn, and try to help others learn. But that's what I want. I'd much rather converse with someone who shares none of my values or beliefs as long as they're level-headed, not resorting to trickery or fallacious reasoning, are willing to source their statements, and respect me in dialogue.

[^1]: I saw one yesterday where the person copy-and-pasted something like "Russia started the war" about 10 times across a thread, several times replying to the same person, sometimes other people. Every time, it wasn't actually directly relevant to the comment they replied to. It's just an attempt to brute-force shut someone down.

For the "schedule expression" (the * * * * * part), try https://crontab.guru/. Some distributions have shortcut expressions like @hourly or @daily so you don't have to type * */1 * * * etc.

The crontab generally has a header that shows the columns, but if not, they're: m h dom mon dow command.

From * * * * * /usr/bin/sct 2750 I'm guessing you want to run every minute. If that's the case, as another commented pointed out, try */1 * * * * /usr/bin/sct 2750, meaning every 1 minute.

How'd you get the pass to talk for everyone?

We the public

We all

Ben Wallace does not speak for the vast majority of us, neither do his colleagues in the rest of the party of “me”.

Ah I see, Ben Wallace doesn't speak for us because you do. Got it.

This is really obnoxious behavior to think that you speak for everyone; to assume everyone has the same beliefs you do.

The entire war on drugs is a racist endeavour that has created racist drug laws.

"You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities,” Ehrlichman said. “We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

I want to point out that the fraction of imports/exports between the USA and China is roughly symmetric (by monetary value). In 2022, about 16% of China's exports were to the USA; in 2021, about 17% of the USA's imports were from China.

That being said, you're probably making a valid point about which items are flowing, not just the raw value of goods.

Also, I would think it's generally easier for a producer to find new buyers of what it's already producing, than for a buyer to find a new producer for what it needs.

Edit to add: If we look at the ratio "Exports/Imports", we have about 0.3 for the USA with China, and we have about 3.3 for China with the USA.

From my use of this, it downloads a video and extracts the audio stream from it. In fact, you can see this as it leaves the video file on disk while it's extracting the audio, and the audio-extraction process uses a decent amount of cpu (takes a few minutes for long concert sets on my raspberry pi). AFAICT, there's no way to only download the audio without incurring the unnecessary bandwidth and CPU usage.

Edit: I just checked and the CPU usage seems to be coming from the fact that I am asking yt-dlp to convert the audio format. Now I'm questioning whether it is actually the video that I've seen temporarily on disk or just the audio file in the youtube-native format.

Yes you can. Goodreads has export instructions. On BookWyrm you upload the export file. It maintains ratings, shelves, read status/dates, etc.

Just be careful when you import: some of my titles were matched to completely wrong titles. For example, "The Color Purple" was matched to some other random book with the word Purple in the title. Fortunately, as part of the import process:

• it tells you which books it could not reasonably match and lets you manually match them, and
• it lets you edit any matches it made automatically.

Every book I had in Goodreads was available to add to my shelves on BookWyrm, even if they didn't all happen automatically. Overall though, compared to how many books I had on shelves, only a handful were not handled automatically/properly.

They once tried to say eating red meat is “possibly” cancer-causing as well.

Because it is. Whether the effect size is significant to you or not is one thing, but there is good evidence that it has a nonzero effect. Which is similarly the case here: there is evidence of effect of aspartame, but whether the effect size is significant is up to you to decide (or legislators).