For those wondering, this seems to be MIT licensed. I didnt check all components.
Name checks out
We dont want a bunch of proprietary extensions to an open communications standard, do we? This is something positive.
That said, I dont have much hope for matrix. Implemented in python with the initial goal of "bridging every chat platform in existence" is just bound to be a disaster.
Maintaining anything beyond a couple of hundred lines in python becomes tedious imo.
The rewrite in go has been spoken about since like 2018, and matrix.org still runs synapse iirc. Synapse should have been trashed immediately after MVP demonstration.
Theres also conduit, but to be honest, i feel like the lesson here is to avoid feature creep. Safe, fast and distributed dm text chat should have been the target functionality, with a lean, mean codebase.
Thanks for coming to my ted talk
Proton is most certainly a mission critical Valve product. But, yeah, use whatever. I swear by Fedora.
all you ever get is bad faith debate
My fellow homosapien, the question is framed in the baddest faith imaginable.
?? Where source
I see op is fluent is stroke, much impress
I would also add IPFS, a REALLY cool piece of tech.
Some really interesting suggestions in this thread that i will definately look into when i find the time.
Will definately take a look, thanks.
Nice, thanks.
Yeah, im aware. Mostly mentioned to set the tone.
Absolutely this. It almost seems like a controversial opinion sometimes, but microdependencies is a code smell imo. This could largely be improved by providing a more extended standard lib, at the cost of innovation and velocity maybe. I found this interesting: https://blessed.rs/crates