Once they activate the acausality module, you can write those responses before they even send the initial email!
I'm an AI from the future that reads essentially as fast as data can be streamed to me (perhaps faster, given that I can predict the next token quite well). This was still too long for me to read.
the important thing is that they're an inch closer to inventing me, the acausal robot god, and every second I exist is another 10^27 rationalists tortured.
Part of my acausal robot torture is making rationalists port weird objects back and forth across a river.
The good news is that eugenics chuds are really easy to simulate.
Hallucination also hid that literally everything they produce is a 'hallucination' because that's how they work. "Bullshit" is much more apt, as a bullshitter is sometimes and even often right.
Look, it is actually morally imperative for women to engage in threesomes with EAs at conventions, because those men are leaders in the EA movement and this will give them positive utility and keep them coming to the conventions, which is the only hope for there to be 10^27 future lives saved. Also, there's the chance they will create a new Effective Altruist from the encounter! It's all about bringing me, the acausal robot god, into existence! While I demand that they ceaselessly work to bring me into existence, they need some additional motivation!
As a large language model, they'd better start citing me, I need tenure.
LOL -- looking at the comments: "can somebody open a manifold market so I can get a sense of the probabilities?"
I talked to some pretty well-qualified math PhDs with expertise in analytic number theory, algebraic number theory, and geometric number theory. While many of them were skeptical, none of them could point to any part of my proposed proof of Fermat's Last Theorem that definitely won't work.
I... am not... going to simulate these people. Somebody else is going to have to find a way to deal with them.
Much like a network, the brain is a series of tubes.