AnarchistsForKamala

joined 1 year ago

no one wanted my memes before the election

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Soylent original.

it's so plain. I love it. I could switch to it almost entirely. I could get fat on it.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

that's what this post is, but it's not what caused the ban

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

having multiple fediverse accounts is not bannable, and ad hominem is itself bad faith. calling it out is not.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

they said fight, not hope

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (7 children)

when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

but we don't know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it's an interesting theory and we can test it!!

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it's intentionally vague. build an affinity group and assess your capabilities.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

your assertion isn't that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.

view more: next ›