Arghblarg

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Would this be the same s 'corn fritters' in Canada?

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

OK Romania, now you know which building needs to have repeated, ongoing cockroach and bedbug infestations... and stinky cheeses/spoiled milk 'accidentally' ending up in the HVAC systems.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I'm 50/50 on whether that name is awesome, or a big 'Oof' marketing-wise ;-)

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, hashcash. Wish that had taken off, it was a good idea ...

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Just using "LLM" is also a bit over-specific, however, as it'd exclude text-to-image models, and others.

Fair point. I haven't heard of an equivalent to LLM for, as per your example, text-to-image models. Hmm.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Oooh, Iike that one.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel this -- we had a junior dev on our project who started using AI for coding, without management approval BTW (it was a small company and we didn't yet have a policy specifically for it. Alas.)

I got the fun task, months later, of going through an entire component that I'm almost certain was 'vibe coded' -- it "worked" the first time the main APIs were called, but leaked and crashed on subsequent calls. It used double- and even triple-pointers to data structures, which the API vendor's documentation upon some casual reading indicated could all be declared statically and re-used (this was an embedded system); needless arguments; mallocs and frees everywhere for no good reason (again due to all of the un-needed dynamic storage involving said double/triple pointers to stuff). It was a horrible mess.

It should have never gotten through code review, but the senior devs were themselves overloaded with work (another, separate problem) ...

I took two days and cleaned it all up, much simpler, no mem leaks, and could actually be, you know, used more than once.

Fucking mess, and LLMs (don't call it "AI") just allow those who are lazy and/or inexperienced to skate through short-term tasks, leaving huge technical debt for those that have to clean up after.

If you're doing job interviews, ensure the interviewee is not connected to LLMs in any way and make them do the code themselves. No exceptions. Consider blocking LLMs from your corp network as well and ban locally-installed things like Ollama.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Please everyone, consider calling "AI" something more accurate -- they're not intelligent, though definitely 'artificial' as in man-made. I personally like the terms "stochastic parrot" or even just "LLM".

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fuck AI. This company and whomever created such videos should be charged with hate crimes and fraud. So tired of this bullshit ruining society and the internet.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

PRAISE "BOB"!!

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 47 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Terrifying

Edit: Beware the Goopacapra!

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and they used the name first, not google. Arseholes.

2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Arghblarg@lemmy.ca to c/APL@lemmy.ca
3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Arghblarg@lemmy.ca to c/APL@lemmy.ca
 

 

🟩 70 minutes in: $21.40 / 19,86 € (volume: 168513)

🟩 65 minutes in: $21.18 / 19,65 € (volume: 160236)

🟩 60 minutes in: $21.07 / 19,55 € (volume: 157020)

🟩 55 minutes in: $21.02 / 19,51 € (volume: 149683)

🟩 50 minutes in: $20.98 / 19,46 € (volume: 140442)

🟩 45 minutes in: $20.95 / 19,43 € (volume: 133779)

🟥 40 minutes in: $20.77 / 19,27 € (volume: 127291)

🟩 35 minutes in: $20.80 / 19,30 € (volume: 123795)

🟥 30 minutes in: $20.77 / 19,27 € (volume: 116641)

🟥 25 minutes in: $20.78 / 19,28 € (volume: 108008)

🟩 20 minutes in: $20.80 / 19,30 € (volume: 101356)

🟩 15 minutes in: $20.49 / 19,01 € (volume: 90143)

🟩 10 minutes in: $20.43 / 18,95 € (volume: 75814)

🟩 5 minutes in: $20.31 / 18,85 € (volume: 57289)

🟩 0 minutes in: $19.56 / 18,15 € (volume: 43187)

🟥 US close price: $17.46 / 16,20 € ($17.39 / 16,13 € after-hours)

US market volume: 36.83 million shares

3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Arghblarg@lemmy.ca to c/synths@midwest.social
 

Best book for learning the ins and outs of MIDI I've ever encountered. Relatively obscure, but an invaluable reference book for anyone wanting to dig into the details of how MIDI works.

 

Nothing we apes don't already know (at least those of us who've been here for 84 years or so), but an interesting take from the MSM on it.

The system is rigged, this is one of the reasons why I Buy, HODL, DRS!

 

A wire broke off the ignitor element in our Harman unit. I have ordered a replacement and it looks simple enough to fix myself. But before sourcing the part I had called about 5 different fireplace companies in the area, and it seems everyone has dropped all support for pellet stoves in recent years! Not only does no one sell them any more (other than Canadian Tire), but they all outright refused to even consider sending a repairperson to help.

It's a bit infuriating. I am calling them, literally saying "please come take my money at your standard hourly rate". One would think "struggling businesses" would be more willing to take on what should be profitable work.

Is it such a liability issue for them that they're actually afraid to take on the work?

What if something bigger fails someday on my pellet stove? Why is no one on the island now willing to work on one?

If you know of someone who does still service wood pellet stoves on the island (Courtenay/Comox), please reply here or DM me. Thanks.

EDIT: formatting

 

What does this mean? New levels of ass-covering for bank malfeasance, or just the regular sort of opacity?

Also see the original 'interim' declaration: https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rules-policies/5/52-502/ontario-instrument-52-502-exemption-national-instrument-52-112-non-gaap-and-other-financial

and

https://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng/osfi-bsif/rep-rap/blueprint-plan-directeur/Pages/supervision-surveillance-let.aspx

Thanks to re⊃⊃it user JackTheTranscoder for links.

 

Good video by Richard Newton updating the whole GME story from the start up to today.

view more: ‹ prev next ›