BodilessGaze

joined 2 years ago
[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Where do you get news from?

You just need more practice.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about the M-expression version (f[x])?

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago

I can guarantee you won't be concerned about "all this" anymore after drinking that glass, since the mercury poisioning will give you much bigger things to worry about. My personal favorite symptom of mercury poisoning is a permanent feeling that insects are crawling under your skin (formication).

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Same reason Batman survives injuries that would be fatal to a normal person and why the thugs he beats up never die: the DC universe is just built different.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Little tech? Like, a micro company that makes software? A "micro-soft", if you will.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 77 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

I work in big tech and this is my life. I envy anyone who thinks you're exaggerating, because that means they haven't experienced the joy of spending weeks trying to track down the team responsible for a bug and then months hassling them to fix it.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Me and my 9 disembodied heads judging people that don't learn an adhoc functional programming language solely so they can run Linux

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

~aaaaaaa~aaaaaa^AAAAAAAAAAAAAH^

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

But how would they rake in profits? These people are only paying $200/month at most, and OpenAI has already said they're losing money on Pro subscribers due to the cost of running those models. I don't see how OpenAI is going to become profitable off the consumer market alone, which means they have to focus on the business market. These AI addicts are a dangerous distraction to them, because not only are they losing money the more that susbscribe, but they're also getting bad publicity and attracting attention from regulators. That could scare off their actual cash cows (enterprise companies).

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

It changed my life. No words can possibly describe it.

 

Alt text: mod going MAD WITH POWER by inserting "rule" in the title of a post lacking it

(this is sarcasm, in case that wasn't abundantly clear)

 

From the conclusion:

NAT may be a good short term solution to the address depletion and scaling problems. This is because it requires very few changes and can be installed incrementally. NAT has several negative characteristics that make it inappropriate as a long term solution, and may make it inappropriate even as a short term solution. Only implementation and experimentation will determine its appropriateness.

 
view more: next ›