[-] CynAq@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

I can’t believe in this day and age marijuana is still an object of political influence.

Just legalize the shit, period. What’s with all the conditionals attached to it? You just have to marginalize users one way or the other because god forbid we have fewer things “those people” do to point fingers at.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Right? Both the Israeli and Qatari governments suck ass

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Hua long dong 6 is a hell of a name tho

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

there's always that one bootlicker

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

LLMs are "generate something that sounds like it would answer the prompt" machines. Nothing more and nothing less.

Through that lens, they are a lot less impressive, a lot less frustrating and also a lot more fun.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

What in the actual fuck?

This is like a physical embodiment of Poe's law.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Xitting, pronounced "shitting"

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

I, too, agree with the scientists that we're all well and truly fucked.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who told you western teenagers were too dumb to understand this fact and would fail to include the remedies to their ideology when they rile up against capitalism?

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Or conversely, a Christian apologist coming to an atheist community and saying "if god isn't real why do good things" as if declaring you are a poorly educated sociopath is a good way to challenge people's well formed ideas.

I've spent quite a bit of time trying to explain to some people why "woke leftists" are so quick to shut them up that they feel like they aren't given a right to speak their minds. "Woke" ideas are generally more developed and complex than "common sense" ideas, which requires some thought being put into them while they evolve from basic to their current level, so when you challenge a person's developed idea with a superficial, usually knee jerk level question or critique, you're most likely engaging in a line of thinking they were done with quite early in their evolution of the idea you're trying to challenge.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

YSK it's a lot. Alot is a fictional character created to illustrate this point.

[-] CynAq@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Agreed.

With the submarine story, it's like a film scenario. Every detail is something unusual, and not tragic in itself. Well, depends on who you ask. There are many people who think billionaires existing is a very real tragedy, and rightly so, but I digress.

With billionaires in a comic-book-supervillain submarine lost on their way to see the Titanic wreck, you can laugh at the $30 controller, or wonder where their brains were, or if anybody looked at their financials because this also would work as a movie scenario where 4 billionaires pay someone to disappear them because they didn't pay taxes or something.

Refugee boat sinking is actual tragedy, with the added bonus of the entire western world having some level of guilt in creating. When the average, empathy having person hears about it, they feel complex emotions from sadness to guilty conscience for casually hearing about it from the comfort of their couch... It's difficult to deal with.

view more: next ›

CynAq

joined 1 year ago